Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Minnesota v. Keith Richard Rossberg, 851 N.W.2d 609.
- State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Ed Cadwell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Jesse Keith Fultz
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(holding defendant failed to preserve for review on direct appeal a claim that his right of confrontation was violated when defendant’s objection to admission of victim’s statements was based solely on the residual hearsay exception and it was not apparent from the context of defendant’s argument
-
State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Ed Cadwell
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
the supreme court addressed a Confrontation Clause claim under the plain-error standard when the defendant failed to object to admission of hearsay testimony and “a Confrontation Clause challenge was not apparent” when the defendant objected only on hearsay grounds.
- State of Minnesota v. President Pimping Austin Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. President Pimping Austin
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
illuminates the history of the relationship between an accused and a victim.’” ( 161 (Minn. 2004)).