Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Minnesota v. Eddie Matthew Mosley, 853 N.W.2d 789.

159 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Gregory Antoine Davis 864 N.W.2d 171 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Dario Jothzan Abla-Salmeron Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Dario Jothzan Abla-Salmeron Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Rulings concerning the admission of expert testimony generally rest within the sound discretion of the district court and will not be reversed absent a clear abuse of discretion.” -99 (Minn. 2014).
State of Minnesota v. Wayne Deante Akis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Wayne Deante Akis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“An error is plain if it is clear or obvious; this means an error that violates or contradicts case law, a rule, or an applicable standard of conduct.”
State of Minnesota v. Spidel Wayne Browder Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Spidel Wayne Browder Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Under that test, the defendant has the burden to demonstrate that the misconduct constitutes (1) error, (2) that is plain.” 11
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Joseph Corbett Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Joseph Corbett Minn. Ct. App. 2014
But “[a]ny details affecting the reliability of the testimony, such as the opportunity of the witness to observe the defendant at the time in question, go to the weight the trier of fact should give to the testimony, not to its admissibility.”