Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Campbell, 861 N.W.2d 95.

56 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Tyrone Bill Harper Minn. Ct. App. 2015
404(b); 4 State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 490-91
State of Minnesota v. Gentry Allan Needham Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“To prevail on [a] Spreigl argument, [a defendant] must show that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting the evidence and that the erroneous admission was prejudicial.”
State of Minnesota v. Brian J. Machacek Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Brian J. Machacek Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. James Michael Soderbeck Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. James Michael Soderbeck Minn. Ct. App. 2015
other bad-acts evidence.” 3 The supreme court recently stated that “[t]he erroneous admission of Spreigl evidence is harmless unless it substantially influenced the verdict.”