Cited by

(citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).

(citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).

451 (Minn. 2011) (holding that a lawyer’s failure to explain th e effect of an opposing party’s bankruptcy on pending litigation violated Rule 1.4(b)); In re Greenman , (holding that a lawyer’s failure to explain that unanswered requests for admission were deemed admitted violated Rule 1 .4(b)).

See, (failing to communicate with the court or to attend hearings); –42 (Minn. 2018) (refusing to respond to the judge and offering “minimal” involvement during the remainder of a trial); –74 (Minn. 2015) (terminating representation of the client 8 days before a hearing, but failing to file a notice of termination with the district court and failing to appear at the hearing); (stating that “[d]isrespectful conduct directed at a tribunal can be prej

” In re Greenman , (citation omitted).

See, e.g. , Adams Powell, d at 646

In re Greenman , d 368, 377 (Minn. 2015).

In re Greenman , , 376 (Minn. 2015).

See Rule 14(e), RLPR ; In re Greenman , , 371 (Minn. 2015).

("The purpose of disciplinary sanctions is 'not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.'" ().

We give “great weight” to the referee’s recommendation, but we “maintain the ultimate responsibility for determining the appropriate sanction.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).