DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Nissalke v. State, 861 N.W.2d 88.

128 citing documents.

  • Jermaine Kershawn Perry v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • Jermaine Kershawn Perry v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • State of Minnesota v. Joseph Harvey Bellanger Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • State of Minnesota v. Joseph Harvey Bellanger Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    To prevail on an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, Bellanger must show “(1) that his counsel’s representation ‘fell below an objective standard of reasonableness’; and (2) ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688, 694, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064, 2068 (1984)).
  • State of Minnesota v. Warren Fred Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • State of Minnesota v. Warren Fred Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show “(1) that his counsel’s representation ‘fell below an objective standard of reasonableness’; and (2) ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688, 694, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064, 2068 (1984)).
  • State of Minnesota v. Dustin James Wallin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • State of Minnesota v. Dustin James Wallin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show “(1) that his counsel’s representation ‘fell below an objective standard of reasonableness’; and (2) ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s 7 unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688, 694, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064, 2068 (1984)).
  • Francisco Vincent Vargas v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • Mackenzie Leigh Meier v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • Francisco Vincent Vargas v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    his counsel’s representation ‘fell below an objective standard of reasonableness’; and (2) ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the 9 proceeding would have been different.’” (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688, 694, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064, 2068 (1984)).
  • Mackenzie Leigh Meier v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    Ineffective assistance of counsel To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, appellant must demonstrate “(1) that [her] counsel’s representation ‘fell below an objective standard of reasonableness’; and (2) ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688, 694, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064, 2068 (1984)).
  • State of Minnesota v. Isaiah Triell Hall Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • State of Minnesota v. Isaiah Triell Hall Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, an appellant must show “(1) that his counsel’s representation ‘fell below an objective standard of reasonableness’; and (2) ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688, 694, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064, 2068 (1984)).
  • Megan Marie Kochendorfer v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • Megan Marie Kochendorfer v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • State of Minnesota v. Sheikh Nyane Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • State of Minnesota v. Sheikh Nyane Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show “(1) that his counsel’s representation ‘fell below an objective standard of reasonableness’; and (2) ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688, 694, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064, 2068 (1984)); (stating that a reviewing court need not address both parts of the Strickland tes
  • Sara Elaine Katra v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • Sara Elaine Katra v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    s. To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, Katra must demonstrate “(1) that [her] counsel’s representation ‘fell below an objective standard of reasonableness’; and (2) ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” 8 (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688, 694, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064, 2068 (1984)).
  • Patrick Samuel Meszaros v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • Patrick Samuel Meszaros v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, appellant must demonstrate “(1) that his counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness; and (2) there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” (quotations omitted).
  • Crystal Marie Vodinelich v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • Crystal Marie Vodinelich v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show “(1) that his counsel’s representation ‘fell below an objective standard of reasonableness’; and (2) ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688, 694, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064, 2068 (1984)).
  • Chaun Dubae Carridine v. State of Minnesota 867 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 2015
  • Chaun Dubae Carridine v. State of Minnesota 867 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 2015
    n.4 (Minn. 2015) (discussing the Knaffla exceptions and the unresolved issues raised by the 2005 amendment to Minn. Stat. § 590.01 (2014)).
  • Jose Manuel Flores v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • Jose Manuel Flores v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    E. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show “(1) that his counsel’s representation ‘fell below an objective standard of reasonableness’; and (2) ‘there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688, 694, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064, 2068 (1984)).