Cited by

57 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Andrew John Kramer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
If appellant makes this showing, the error will be corrected only if it “seriously affect[s] the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
State of Minnesota v. Patrick James Buswell Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The invited-error doctrine provides that “a party cannot assert on appeal an error that he invited or that he could have prevented at the district court.” (quotation omitted).
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, Appellant, v. Byron David SMITH, Appellant, Respondent 876 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 2016
public trial...’” (quoting U.S. Constamend.
State of Minnesota v. True Thao 875 N.W.2d 834 Minn. 2016
( (“We will not consider pro se claims on appeal that are unsupported by either arguments or citations to legal authority.”)).
Joshua Steven Parsons v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(explaining that, in deciding whether the evidence significantly affected the verdict, we can consider several factors, including whether the district court provided a cautionary instruction and “whether the evidence of guilt was overwhelming”).
State of Minnesota v. Alfonzo Benjamin Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Larry Maurice Taylor Minn. Ct. App. 2015