State of Minnesota v. Cree Rae Larson
Also decided on this docket: Minn. Ct. App., July 14, 2014; Minn., August 19, 2015 868 N.W.2d 686
Opinion text
OFFICE
APPELLATE COURTS
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AUG 1 9 2015
IN SUPREME COURT
FILED
A14-0128
State of Minnesota,
Appellant,
vs.
Cree Rae Larson,
Respondent.
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that in light of our opinion in State v. Lindquist, No.
Al2-0599, N.\V.2d (Minn. Aug. 19, 2015), holding that the exclusionary rule
does not apply to violations of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, or Article
I, Section 10, of the Minnesota Constitution, when law enforcement acts in good faith,
objectively reasonable reliance on binding appellate precedent, the decision of the court of
appeals is reversed and this matter is remanded to the district court for trial.
Dated: August 19, 20 15
~UR!J
,/)ch.
t ~-
G. Barry Anderson
Associate Justice
GILDEA, C.J. dissents.
PAGE, J., dissents.
LILLEHAUG, J., dissents.
2
DISSENT
GILDEA, Chief Justice (dissenting).
For the reasons set forth in my dissent in State v. Lindquist, No. A12-0599
-
N.W.2d - (Minn. Aug. 19, 2015), I respectfully dissent.
D-1
DISSENT
PAGE, Justice (dissenting).
For the reasons set forth in my dissent in State v. Lindquist, No. Al2-0599,
N.W. 2d _(Minn. Aug. 19, 2015), I respectfully dissent.
D-1
DISSENT
LILLEHAUG, Justice (dissenting).
For the reasons set fmih in my dissent in State v. Lindquist, No. Al2-0599, _
N.W.2d _(Minn. Aug. 19, 2015), I respectfully dissent.