Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ryan Contracting Company v. O’Neill & Murphy, LLP, et al, 883 N.W.2d 236.

19 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Frank John Rakowiecki Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Frank John Rakowiecki Minn. Ct. App. 2026
15 (citing Ryan Contracting Co. v. O’Neill & Murphy, LLP, -49 (Minn. 2016)).
State of Minnesota v. Chad Edward Danberry Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Under the doctrine of judicial estoppel, “when a party assumes a certain position in a legal proceeding, and succeeds in maintaining that position, [they] may not thereafter, simply because [their] interests have changed, assume a contrary position, especially if it prejudices the party who acquiesced in the position taken by [them] .” Ryan Contracting Co. v. O’ Neill & Murphy, LLP
Accredited Electrical Solutions, LLC v. PinPoint Homes, LLC, CCM Finance, LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Ryan Contracting Co. v. O’Neill & Murphy, LLP
EDF-RE US Development, LLC v. RES America Construction, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Generally, “when a party assumes a certain position in a legal proceeding, and succeeds in maintaining that position, he may not thereafter, simply because his interests have changed, assume a contrary position, especially if it prejudices the party who acquiesced in the position taken by him.” Ryan Contracting Co. v. O’Neill & Murphy, LLP, d 236, 248 (Minn. 2016).
All, Inc. v. Christopher Hagen, Fair & Square Remodeling LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See, e.g., Ryan Contracting Co. v. O’Neill & Murphy, LLP
In the Matter of the Eligibility of Ted Johnson for MSRS General Employees Retirement Plan Coverage Minn. Ct. App. 2021
This rule “r eflects the basic intuition that when a modifier appears at the end of a list, it is easier to apply that modifier only to the item directly before it.” Ryan Contracting Co. v. O’Neill & Murphy, LLP , (quotation omitted).
Lighthouse Management Inc. v. Oberg Family Farms, et al., American Federal Bank, Gateway Building Systems, Inc., CITYWide Electric, … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“To the exte nt there is ambiguity, mechanic’s lien laws are strictly construed as to the question of whether a lien attaches, but are liberally construed after the lien is created with respect to the enforcement of the lien.” Ryan Contracting Co. v. O’Neill & Murphy, LLP
Timberwall Landscape & Masonry Products, Inc. v. DRMP Concrete Limited Liability Company, Anton Klochko, et al., Associated Bank … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A mechanic’s lien is a statutory remedy available to those who furnish labor or materials in the improvement of real property.” Ryan Contracting Co. v. O’Neill & Murphy, LLP
In re the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Matthew David Feeney Minn. Ct. App. 2019
App. P. 103.04; Ryan Contracting Co. v. O’Neill & Murphy, LLP, (addressing whether an appellant was entitled to a jury trial on damages “in the 6 interests of judicial economy because it is likely to arise on remand”), aff’d as modified
Robert F. Goerdt, et al v. Lucille Goerdt, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Ryan Contracting Co. v. O’Neill & Murphy, LLP, (addressing issue in case “in the interests of judicial economy because it is likely to arise on remand”), aff’d as modified, Minn. R. Civ.
Axia Contracting, LLC v. Jon Grefsrud, et al., Minnesota National Bank Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Ryan Contracting Co. v. O’Neill & Murphy, LLP
State v. Pakhnyuk 926 N.W.2d 914 Minn. 2019
State v. Pakhnyuk 926 N.W.2d 914 Minn. 2019
Ryan Contracting Co. v. O'Neill & Murphy, LLP , , 244-45 (Minn. 2016).
In re the Custody of M. M. L. Nathan James Sands v. Sue Mae Lovick, Dakota County Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Ryan Contracting Co. v. O’Neill & Murphy, LLP , (addressing issue in case “in the interests of judicial economy because it is likely to arise on remand”), aff’d as modified, d 236 (Minn. 2016); see also Minn. R. Civ.
Galyna Anderson v. Melissa Houghtaling, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2017
action a plaintiff must show: “(1) the existence of an attorney-client relationship; (2) acts constituting negligence 9 or breach of contract; (3) that such acts were the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s damages; and (4) that but for defendant’s conduct, the plaintiff would have been successful in the prosecution or defense of the action.” Ryan Contracting Co. v. O’Neill & Murphy , LLP, (quotation omitted).
State v. Thonesavanh 904 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 2017
M & G Services, Inc. v. Buffalo Lake Advanced Biofuels, LLC 895 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
M & G Services, Inc. v. Buffalo Lake Advanced Biofuels, LLC 895 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A mechanic’s lien provides the claimant with a non-consensual lien or security interest in the improved property.” Ryan Contracting Co. v. O’Neill & Murphy, LLP