Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Jerome Deon Nunn v. State of Minnesota, 868 N.W.2d 230.

25 citing documents.

Karl Alfredo Rosillo, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Karl Alfredo Rosillo, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Fidel Pizarro-Rios v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Fidel Pizarro-Rios v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2025
The district court “abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous application of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
Joshua Chiazor Ezeka, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. 2025
Joshua Chiazor Ezeka, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. 2025
See McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279, 292 (1987); –34 (Minn. 2015).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Aug.
Elijah Ahmad Milsap, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous application of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State v. Overweg 922 N.W.2d 179 Minn. 2019
State v. Overweg 922 N.W.2d 179 Minn. 2019
Nunn v. State , , 232 (Minn. 2015).
Demetreus Anthony McGinnis, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous application of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
Browder v. State 899 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Browder v. State 899 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Lana Dawn Hansch Barnes v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Lana Dawn Hansch Barnes v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous application of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
Harry Jerome Evans v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 357 Minn. 2016
Harry Jerome Evans v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 357 Minn. 2016
Clinton Lee Strother v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Andre LeBlanc v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Clinton Lee Strother v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous application of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
Andre LeBlanc v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Thomas Ardell Gentry v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Thomas Ardell Gentry v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous application of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Stevan Andre Wilkins Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Stevan Andre Wilkins Minn. Ct. App. 2016

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by