Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood, 886 N.W.2d 485.

95 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Waters v. Comm'r Revenue 920 N.W.2d 613 Minn. 2018
Waters v. Comm'r Revenue 920 N.W.2d 613 Minn. 2018
State v. Haywood , , 488 (Minn. 2016).
State v. Decker 916 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 2018
LaPenotiere v. State 916 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2018
LaPenotiere v. State 916 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2018
State v. Haywood , , 488 (Minn. 2016).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
While the word “instrumentality” is not specifically defined in the statute, “instrumentality” is broadly defined as “[a] thing used to achieve an end or purpose.” Black’s Law Dictionary 919 (10th ed. 2014); see also State v. Haywood , 90 (Minn. 2016) (stating principle that courts may ascertain ordinary usage of words with the aid of dictionary definitions).
Kremer v. Kremer 912 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 2018
In re 911 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2018
In re 911 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2018
State v. Haywood , , 488 (Minn. 2016).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2018
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2018
To determine plain meaning, we “look to the dictionary definitions of th[e] words and apply them in the context of the statute.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The district cour t inquired about the effect of State v. Haywood , on the charges against appellant.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
a CO 2 powered BB gun is not a “firearm” for purposes of Minn. Stat. § 609.165, subd.
State v. Janecek 903 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Janecek 903 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Ivy 902 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Ivy 902 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Larsen 901 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Larsen 901 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Provost 901 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Provost 901 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In November 2016, Provost successfully petitioned a Kandiyohi County postconviction court to vacate his January 2015 conviction for possession of a firearm by an ineligible person, based on the Minnesota Supreme Court’s that an air-powered BB gun is not a firearm.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Phone Recovery Services, LLC v. Qwest Corp. 901 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Phone Recovery Services, LLC v. Qwest Corp. 901 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Prigge 900 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Prigge 900 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The objective of statutory interpretation is to ascertain and effectuate the Legislature’s intent.” (quotation omitted).
In re Disciplinary Action Against Bulmer 899 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 2017
(order) (60-day suspension); (order) (15-month suspension); (order) (90-day suspension).
State v. Larson 895 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Larson 895 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of Unity Health Care, Class F Home License No. 352187 and Unity Home Care, Inc., … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of Unity Health Care, Class F Home License No. 352187 and Unity Home Care, Inc., … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“It is not for the [lower] courts to make, amend, or change the statutory law, but only to apply it.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Galen Dale Littlewind Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Galen Dale Littlewind Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-91 4 (Minn. 2016) (reversing conviction of defendant charged with felon in possession of a firearm, when defendant had an air-powered BB gun, not a firearm within the meaning of the statute).
State of Minnesota v. Joshua David Donson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Joshua David Donson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Although a BB gun is not considered a firearm, analogizing to LaMere, whether the device appellant pointed at C.P.
State of Minnesota v. Kim Marie Halvorson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Kim Marie Halvorson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Ronald Gene Kremmin 889 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Ronald Gene Kremmin 889 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“In the absence of a statutory definition, we look to dictionary definitions to determine the plain meaning of words.”
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Elijah Mason Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Elijah Mason Minn. Ct. App. 2016
After briefing and before oral argument in this case, (Minn. 2016), which held that “[u]nder Minn. Stat. § 609.165 (2014), the plain meaning of the word ‘firearm’ does not include an air-powered BB gun.” At oral argument to this court, the state agreed that Mason’s conviction should be reversed under Haywood.
State of Minnesota v. Lue Yang 887 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 2016