Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Darryl Colbert v. State of Minnesota, 870 N.W.2d 616.
- MicLeonard James Fisherman, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- MicLeonard James Fisherman, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Randy Leeroyal Swaney v. State of Minnesota 882 N.W.2d 207 Minn. 2016
- Randy Leeroyal Swaney v. State of Minnesota 882 N.W.2d 207 Minn. 2016
- Tracy Alan Zornes v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 2016
- Jerome Emmanuel Davis v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 2016
- Joel Marvin Munt v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 2016
- Tracy Alan Zornes v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 2016
- Joel Marvin Munt v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 2016
- Jerome Emmanuel Davis v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 2016
- Clinton Lee Strother v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Clinton Lee Strother v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Thomas Ardell Gentry v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Thomas Ardell Gentry v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
1 (2014); (stating that under Knaffla rule, “once a direct appeal has been taken, all claims raised in the direct appeal and all claims that were known or should have been known but were not raised in the direct appeal are procedurally barred” (emphasis omitted)).
- Aaron Wayne Downing v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Aaron Wayne Downing v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Under Knaffla and its progeny, “once a direct appeal has been taken, all claims raised in the direct appeal and all claims that were known or should have been known but were not raised in the direct appeal are procedurally barred.” d 616, 626 (Minn. 2015); see also Minn. Stat. § 590.01, subd.
- State of Minnesota v. David Mendoza Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. David Mendoza
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Generally, there are two types of error: structural error and trial error.”
- Thomas Daniel Rhodes v. State of Minnesota, A13-560 875 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 2016
- Thomas Daniel Rhodes v. State of Minnesota, A13-560 875 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 2016
- Rene Julian McKenzie v. State of Minnesota 872 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 2015
-
Rene Julian McKenzie v. State of Minnesota
872 N.W.2d 865
Minn. 2015
Graham, d at 349 (“In determining whether the State has infringed on a defendant’s constitutional right to present a defense .
- State of Minnesota v. John Everette Pierce Minn. Ct. App. 2015