In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST John B. ARNOLD, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 3190
Opinion text
STATE OF MINNESOTA
IN SUPREME COURT
Al4-0924
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against
John B. Arnold, a Minnesota Attorney,
Registration No. 3190.
ORDER
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a
petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent John B. Arnold committed
professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, forging his clients'
signatures on a settlement agreement, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(b). and
(c). Respondent pleaded guilty to aggravated forgery, a felony, and identity theft, a gross
misdemeanor. The district court stayed adjudication of respondent's guilt on the
aggravated forgery charge, convicted him of identity theft, and placed him on probation.
Respondent unconditionally admits the allegations in the petition, waives his
rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and has
entered into a stipulation with the Director in which they jointly recommend that the
appropriate discipline is suspension from the practice of law for a minimum of 1 year.
This court has independently r~viewed the file and approves the jointly
recommended disposition.
Based. upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Respondent John B. Arnold is suspended from the practice of law with no
right to petition for reinstatement for a minimum of 1 year;
2. Respondent may petition for reinstatement pursuant to Rule 18(a)-(d),
RLPR. Reinstatement is conditioned on successful completion of the professional
responsibility portion of the state bar examination, satisfaction of continuing legal
education requirements pursuant to Rule 18(e), RLPR, and proof of compliance with the
terms of respondent's criminal probation;.
3. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of
suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals), and shall pay $900 in costs
pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR; and ·
4. If respondent violates his criminal probation, the Director may, after notice
to respondent and an opportunity to be heard, move the court to impose additional
discipline.
Dated: June 26, 2014
BY THE COURT:
Alan C. Page
Associate Justice.
2