In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Patrick J. NOLAN, III, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 121307
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Patrick J. NOLAN, III, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 121307, 859 N.W.2d 287 (Minn. 2015).
Opinion text
fiL--
STATE OF MINNESOTA
February 9, 2015
IN SUPREME COURT Dm~EOF
APPB.lAlEC s
A15-0137
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against
Patrick J. Nolan, III, a Minnesota Attorney,
Registration No. 121307.
ORDER
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition
for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Patrick J. Nolan, III, committed
professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, being convicted of a
felony for making a false statement to United States Postal Inspection Service agents
during the course of a criminal investigation, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct
8.4(b) and 8.4(c).
Respondent watves his rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional
Responsibility (RLPR), unconditionally admits the allegations in the petition, and with
the Director recommends that the appropriate discipline is an indefinite suspension with
no right to petition for reinstatement for 3 years.
The court independently reviewed the file and approves the recommended
disposition.
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Respondent Patrick J. Nolan, III, is indefinitely suspended from the practice
of law, effective as of the date of the filing of this order, with no right to petition for
reinstatement for 3 years.
2. Respondent may petition for reinstatement pursuant to Rule 18(a)-(d),
RLPR. Reinstatement is conditioned on successful completion of the professional
responsibility portion of the state bar examination, satisfaction of continuing legal
education requirements pursuant to Rule 18(e), RLPR, and proof of compliance with the
terms of respondent's criminal probation.
3. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of
suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals), and shall pay $900 in costs
pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.
Dated: February 9, 2015
BY THE COURT:
2