Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Robert Marlyn Taylor v. State of Minnesota, 874 N.W.2d 429.

21 citing documents.

Robert Bryant Salley, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Robert Bryant Salley, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Orlando Omar Castillo, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
” could potentially “satisfy the interests of justice requirement.” See, e.g., Wayne, d at 920 (holding that these factors do not satisfy the interests-of-justice requirement “in the context of a petitioner who has previously filed a petition for postconviction relief that was not time-barred.”); (same); (same).
John Louis Corrigan, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Taylor v. State 910 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 2018
Taylor v. State 910 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 2018
Taylor v. State , , 431 (Minn. 2016).
Zornes v. State 903 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 2017
Zornes v. State 903 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 2017
4(a)-(c) (2016), 5 or procedurally barred under Knaffla, d at 741 , an evidentiary hearing is not necessary
Brown v. State 895 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 2017
Brown v. State 895 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 2017
A16-0648 Minn. 2017
Erasmo Monge Rauda, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
D E C I S I O N “[Appellate courts] review the denial of a petition for postconviction relief, as well as a request for an evid entiary hearing, for an abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted).
Charlie Junior Pryor v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Charlie Junior Pryor v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The interests-of-justice exception “is reserved for exceptional cases.” (quotation omitted).
Jamillo Dante Spight v. State of Minnesota, A15-2007 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jamillo Dante Spight v. State of Minnesota, A15-2007 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
This exception to the two-year time limit “is reserved for exceptional cases.” (quotation 6 omitted).
Julius Antwon Coleman v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Julius Antwon Coleman v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Application of the exception “is reserved for exceptional cases.” (quotation omitted).
Aaron Wayne Downing v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Aaron Wayne Downing v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[Appellate courts] review the denial of a petition for postconviction relief, as well as a request for an evidentiary hearing, for an abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted).