Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Harry Jerome Evans v. State of Minnesota, 880 N.W.2d 357.
-
Munt v. State
920 N.W.2d 410
Minn. 2018
We review a district court's denial of a motion to correct a sentence for an abuse of discretion, Evans v. State , , 359 (Minn. 2016).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Evans v. State , 61 (Minn. 2016).
- State v. Greenough 915 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-
State v. Greenough
915 N.W.2d 915
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Evans v. State , , 359 (Minn. 2016).
- State v. Overweg 914 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-
State v. Overweg
914 N.W.2d 410
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Evans v. State , , 359 (Minn. 2016).
- State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Evans v. State , -60 (Minn. 2016).
- Browder v. State 899 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- Browder v. State 899 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- Darrell Dewayne Dickerson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
Darrell Dewayne Dickerson v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
On the other hand, a motion to correct a sentence should not be construed as a petition for postconviction relief “when the motion does not impact the underlying conviction.” d 357, 360 (Minn. 2016) (holding motion to correct sentence is proper method to challenge court’s legal authority to award restitution); (holding challenge to criminal conviction cannot be made via rule 27.03 “to circumvent the procedural requirements of the postc
- State of Minnesota v. Braden Jay Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Braden Jay Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Berry Alan Willis 883 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Berry Alan Willis 883 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 2016