Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Minnesota v. Debra Lee Fawcett, 884 N.W.2d 380.

56 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Accordingly, the district court did not err in denying West’s motion to suppress his incriminating statements to the investigator.2 B. Search Warrant When reviewing the decision to issue a search warrant, we consider only whether the issuing judge had “a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“When reviewing a judge’s decision to issue a search warrant, [an appellate court’s] only consideration is whether the issuing judge had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed.” (M inn.
State of Minnesota v. Adam Blaine Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Adam Blaine Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Justin Thomas Keodouangdy Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Justin Thomas Keodouangdy Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“When reviewing a judge’s decision to issue a search warrant, our only consideration is whether the issuing judge had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed.” d 380, 384 (Minn. 2016) (quotation omitted).