Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Tracy Alan Zornes v. State of Minnesota, 880 N.W.2d 363.

55 citing documents.

Brent Lanier Lynch, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
When analyzing the first requirement, a court must be 6 mindful that “[a]ppellate counsel has no duty to raise all possible issues, and may choose to present only t he most meritorious claims to the court.” d 363, 371 (Minn. 2016).
Aaron Joseph Morrow v. State of Minnesota 886 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 2016
Aaron Joseph Morrow v. State of Minnesota 886 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 2016
(explaining that “[a]ppellate counsel is not required to raise all possible claims on direct appeal”).
LaQuinn Jamul Williams v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
LaQuinn Jamul Williams v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Nevertheless, an ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel claim that is known but not raised at the time of direct appeal may be brought in a postconviction petition “if review of the claim requires consideration of facts outside those in the trial court record.”