Cited by

Day Masonry v. Independent Sch.

(resolving a question of law not addressed by the district court or the court of appeals in the interests of judicial economy); J.E.B.

(“Failing to raise an issue both before the court of appeals and in a petition for review forfeits the issue.”).

(holding that a high-school basketball coach is not a public official for the purposes of a defamation claim).

We agree that Cloutier failed to challenge the factual findings identified in his brief at the court of appeals and that he did not request review of these findings in his petition for revie w. “Failing to raise an issue both before the court of appeals and in a petition for review forfeits the issue.” see also Minn. Voters All.

See McGuire v. Bowlin , (resolving a question of law not addressed by the court of appeals or district court in the interests of judicial economy).

See McGuire v. Bowlin , (addressing question of law in the interest of judicial economy).

See, e.g., McGuire v. Bowlin , (holding p ublic figures may only recover damages from defamatory falsehoods relating to official conduct if the statements were made with actual malice).

(reviewing an issue on appeal from summary judgment that the parties litigated but the district court did not decide ).

See McGuire v. Bowlin , (“Failing to raise an issue both before the court of appeals and in a petition for review forfeits the issue.”).

(addressing issue in interests of judicial economy and because it presented a question of law).