Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Prahl v. Prahl, 627 N.W.2d 698.

91 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Tarah Ann Aanerud v. James Richard Aanerud Minn. Ct. App. 2015
However, this court “may treat statutory factors as addressed when they are implicit in the findings.”
In re the Marriage of: Kumiko Olivia Highley v. Christopher Alan Kvaal Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Kumiko Olivia Highley v. Christopher Alan Kvaal Minn. Ct. App. 2015
21, 2007); (“A finding is clearly erroneous if the reviewing court is left with the definite 5 and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” (quotation omitted)).
In re the Marriage of: Kathy Ann Hockenson, n/k/a Kathy Ann Lockhart v. Galen Jay Hockenson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Kathy Ann Hockenson, n/k/a Kathy Ann Lockhart v. Galen Jay Hockenson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(noting that a district court’s findings may be implicit).
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(noting that a district court’s compliance with factual-findings requirements can be implicit).
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Ross Wickenhauser v. Denise Esther Wickenhauser, n/k/a Denise Esther Peterson, (A14-0417), and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Ross Wickenhauser v. Denise Esther Wickenhauser, n/k/a Denise Esther Peterson, (A14-0417), and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-42 (Minn. App. 2002) (explaining that if property is acquired in exchange for both marital and nonmarital property, the party seeking to prove its nonmarital character must trace an identifiable 11 portion of the property to a nonmarital source); (concluding that a portion of property was nonmarital where party identified the value of the property at the time of the marriage).
In re the Marriage of: Stephen Joseph Moore v. Lisa Jo Jacobson, f/k/a Lisa Jo Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Stephen Joseph Moore v. Lisa Jo Jacobson, f/k/a Lisa Jo Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Although effective appellate review “is possible only when the [district] court has issued sufficiently detailed findings of fact to demonstrate its consideration of all [relevant] factors,” “failure to make findings is not, alone, sufficient to constitute an abuse of discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Anita Joan Rakow v. Gary Arnold Rakow, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Anita Joan Rakow v. Gary Arnold Rakow, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
A “[r]eservation [of maintenance] allows the court to later assess and address future changes in one party’s situation as those changes arise, without prematurely burdening the other party.”
In re the Marriage of: DeWayne Stanley Farr v. Sophia Marie Farr Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: DeWayne Stanley Farr v. Sophia Marie Farr Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“The issue is, in essence, a balancing of the recipient’s need against the obligor’s ability to pay.” (-40 (Minn. 1982)).
In re the Marriage of: Lizhi Zhang v. Zheng Fu Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Lizhi Zhang v. Zheng Fu Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld Hare, n/k/a Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld v. Robert Russell Hare Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld Hare, n/k/a Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld v. Robert Russell Hare Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“The issue is, in essence, a balancing of the recipient’s need against the obligor’s ability to pay.”
In re the Marriage of: Hniya Abdenbi Kouttay v. Ali Jama Yahia Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Hniya Abdenbi Kouttay v. Ali Jama Yahia Minn. Ct. App. 2014
American Bank of St. Paul v. City of Minneapolis 802 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
American Bank of St. Paul v. City of Minneapolis 802 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Marriage of Maiers v. Maiers 775 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Marriage of Maiers v. Maiers 775 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Alam v. Chowdhury 764 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Alam v. Chowdhury 764 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Marriage of Thompson v. Thompson 739 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of Thompson v. Thompson 739 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of Baker v. Baker 733 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of Baker v. Baker 733 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of Kielley v. Kielley 674 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Marriage of Kielley v. Kielley 674 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is “against logic and the facts on record.”" (quoting Rutten, d at 50 ).
Marriage of Gottsacker v. Gottsacker 664 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 2003
Marriage of Gottsacker v. Gottsacker 664 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 2003
See, (stating that "[a]s an asset acquired with income generated from a nonmarital asset, shares purchased with reinvested dividends become marital property”); (stating that "[u]nlike appreciation, income becomes an asset 'acquired during the marriage
Youker v. Youker 661 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Youker v. Youker 661 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
A district court abuses its discretion when it resolves a matter in a manner that is “against logic and the facts on record.” (quoting Rutten, d at 50 ).
Robert v. Zygmunt 652 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Robert v. Zygmunt 652 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Senske v. Senske 644 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Senske v. Senske 644 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
(nonmarital asset commingled with marital asset may lose its nonmarital status if it cannot be traced to nonmarital source).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by