Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., 644 N.W.2d 72.
- Driscoll v. STANDARD HARDWARE, INC. 785 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
Driscoll v. STANDARD HARDWARE, INC.
785 N.W.2d 805
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
This court “review[s] de novo whether a genuine issue of material fact exists” and “whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
-
Nexus v. Swift
785 N.W.2d 771
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn.2002).
- Hebert v. CITY OF FIFTY LAKES 784 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
Hebert v. CITY OF FIFTY LAKES
784 N.W.2d 848
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn.2002).
- Sampair v. Village of Birchwood 784 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 2010
-
Sampair v. Village of Birchwood
784 N.W.2d 65
Minn. 2010
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
- Opheim v. County of Norman 784 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
Opheim v. County of Norman
784 N.W.2d 90
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., see Minn. R. Civ.
- Schmitz v. RINKE, NOONAN 783 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
Schmitz v. RINKE, NOONAN
783 N.W.2d 733
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn.2002).
- Taylor v. LSI CORP. OF AMERICA 781 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
Taylor v. LSI CORP. OF AMERICA
781 N.W.2d 912
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
“We review de novo whether a genuine issue of material fact exists” and “whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
- MASTER BLASTER, INC. v. Dammann 781 N.W.2d 19 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
- Presbrey v. James 781 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
MASTER BLASTER, INC. v. Dammann
781 N.W.2d 19
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
-
Presbrey v. James
781 N.W.2d 13
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party- against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn.2002).
- Pond Hollow Homeowners Ass'n v. Ryland Group, Inc. 779 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
Pond Hollow Homeowners Ass'n v. Ryland Group, Inc.
779 N.W.2d 920
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn.2002).
- State Bank of Delano v. CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp. 779 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
State Bank of Delano v. CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp.
779 N.W.2d 582
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
- BankCHEROKEE v. INSIGNIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC 779 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
BankCHEROKEE v. INSIGNIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC
779 N.W.2d 896
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
See STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., (stating that whether a genuine issue of material fact exists is reviewed de novo).
- Mountain Peaks Financial Services, Inc. v. Roth-Steffen 778 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
Mountain Peaks Financial Services, Inc. v. Roth-Steffen
778 N.W.2d 380
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
P. 56.03; STAR Ctrs., Inc., v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
- SINGELMAN v. St. Francis Medical Center 777 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
- Rodenwald v. State Department of Natural Resources 777 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
SINGELMAN v. St. Francis Medical Center
777 N.W.2d 540
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
P. 56.03; STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
-
Rodenwald v. State Department of Natural Resources
777 N.W.2d 535
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In determining whether summary judgment was properly granted, we review de novo “whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn.2002).
- City of Cohasset v. Minnesota Power 776 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
City of Cohasset v. Minnesota Power
776 N.W.2d 776
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn.2002).
- Imperial Developers, Inc. v. Calhoun Development, LLC 775 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
-
Imperial Developers, Inc. v. Calhoun Development, LLC
775 N.W.2d 895
Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn.2002).
- Losen v. Allina Health System 767 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
-
Losen v. Allina Health System
767 N.W.2d 703
Minn. Ct. App. 2009
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn.2002).
- Peterka v. Dennis 764 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 2009
-
Peterka v. Dennis
764 N.W.2d 829
Minn. 2009
I. On appeal from summary judgment, we review de novo whether “a genuine issue of material fact exists, and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn.2002).
- Kunza v. St. Mary's Regional Health Center 747 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Petersen 748 N.W.2d 306 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Petersen
748 N.W.2d 306
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
-
Kunza v. St. Mary's Regional Health Center
747 N.W.2d 586
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
- Northern Realty Ventures, LLC v. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 748 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
Northern Realty Ventures, LLC v. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency
748 N.W.2d 296
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.
- Noske v. Friedberg 713 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
-
Noske v. Friedberg
713 N.W.2d 866
Minn. Ct. App. 2006
STAR Centers, Inc. v. Faegre Benson, L.L.P., Minn. R. Civ.
- Thompson v. First State Bank of Fertile 709 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
-
Thompson v. First State Bank of Fertile
709 N.W.2d 307
Minn. Ct. App. 2006
STAR Ctrs., Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn.2002) (citations omitted).
- Roth v. Weir 690 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-
Roth v. Weir
690 N.W.2d 410
Minn. Ct. App. 2005
STAR Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., -77 (Minn.2002) (citations omitted).
- Anderson v. State, Department of Natural Resources 674 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 2004