DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Grunig, 660 N.W.2d 134.

108 citing documents.

  • State v. Voss 683 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Voss 683 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    We note that “[a] respondent can raise alternative arguments on appeal in defense of the underlying decision when there Eire sufficient facts in the record for the appellate court to consider the alternative theories, there is legal support for the arguments, and the alternative grounds would not expand the relief previously granted.”
  • Johnson v. State 673 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 2004
  • Johnson v. State 673 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 2004
  • State v. Bunce 669 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Bunce 669 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Balenger 667 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Balenger 667 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    preme court has held that a respondent may raise alternative arguments on appeal to defend a decision or judgment, without filing a cross-appeal, provided that "there are sufficient facts in the record for the appellate court to consider the alternative theories, there is legal support for the arguments, and the alternative grounds would not expand the relief previously granted.”