Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Budreau, 641 N.W.2d 919.
-
State v. Lehman
749 N.W.2d 76
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
(“[W]e presume that the jury followed the instructions as given.”).
- State v. Hall 722 N.W.2d 472 Minn. 2006
- State v. Manthey 711 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 2006
-
State v. Manthey
711 N.W.2d 498
Minn. 2006
See Long v. Humphrey, 184 F.3d 758, 761 (8th Cir.1999) (discussing curative alternatives less dramatic than mistrial); (stating our presumption that juries follow instructions).
- Deegan v. State 711 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2006
-
Deegan v. State
711 N.W.2d 89
Minn. 2006
A more comprehensive statement of the facts underlying this case can be found in our *92 opinion affirming K.B.'s conviction
- Turnage v. State 708 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 2006
- Turnage v. State 708 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 2006
- Huff v. State 698 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 2005
- Huff v. State 698 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 2005
- State v. Smith 669 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 2003
- State v. Smith 669 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 2003
- Neal v. State 658 N.W.2d 536 Minn. 2003
- Neal v. State 658 N.W.2d 536 Minn. 2003