Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Per…, 664 N.W.2d 1.

84 citing documents.

County of Washington v. City of Oak Park Heights 802 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
-500 (Minn.App.2002), rev’d on other grounds, (agreeing with the observation that municipalities engage in proprietary activities).
Christopher v. Windom Area School Board 781 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Christopher v. Windom Area School Board 781 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Calm Waters, LLC v. Kanabec County Board of Commissioners 756 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 2008
Greene v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services 755 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 2008
Greene v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services 755 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 2008
In Re the Maltreatment & Disqualification of Kleven 736 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Maltreatment & Disqualification of Kleven 736 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Device Permits, In re Univ.
In Re the Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission 731 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission 731 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater 731 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 2007
In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater 731 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 2007
§ 122.4 (f), the MCEA relies on In re Denial of Eller Media Company’s Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Permits (Eller Media), where we noted that we have “the authority to review de novo errors of law which arise when an agency decision is based upon the meaning of words in a statute.” In Eller Media, we did not explicitly discuss any of the factors discussed above; but on review of Eller Media, it becomes apparent that consi
In Re Appeal of Staley 730 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re Appeal of Staley 730 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Claim for Benefits by Hagert 730 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Claim for Benefits by Hagert 730 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Claim for Benefits by Meuleners 725 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Claim for Benefits by Meuleners 725 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Appeal of the Exclusion of Molnar 720 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Appeal of the Exclusion of Molnar 720 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota Heights 708 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 2006
Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota Heights 708 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 2006
As a preliminary matter, we note that “[a] zoning statute or ordinance is one which, by definition, regulates the building development and uses of property.” In re Denial of Eller Media Company’s Applications, see Minn.Stat.
In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater 702 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater 702 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Device Permits, (stating that courts retain authority to review de novo errors of law arising when agency decision is based on statutory construction).
Housing & Redevelopment Authority ex rel. City of Richfield v. Wren 699 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 2005
In Re Wren 699 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 2005
Housing & Redevelopment Authority ex rel. City of Richfield v. Wren 699 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 2005
In Re Wren 699 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 2005
In Re Detailing Criteria & Standards for Measuring an Electric Utility's Good Faith Efforts in Meeting the Renewable … 700 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re Detailing Criteria & Standards for Measuring an Electric Utility's Good Faith Efforts in Meeting the Renewable … 700 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Device Permits, (citing St.
Johnson v. Commissioner of Health 671 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Johnson v. Commissioner of Health 671 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Hare v. State, Department of Human Services 666 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Hare v. State, Department of Human Services 666 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
3a, contains no explicit language that defines the limits of “gender *431 reassignment services.” “We retain the authority to review de novo errors of law which arise when an agency decision is based upon the meaning of words in a statute.” (citation omitted).