Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bondy v. Allen, 635 N.W.2d 244.

25 citing documents.

Kevin Kopka, et al., individually and as parents and natural guardians of minor children B. Kopka and I. … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
at 10 (Minn. 2021) (quotation omitted); see also Bondy v. Allen , (stating i ssues of causation “seldom can be disposed of on a motion for summary judgment” (quotation omitted)).
Frazier v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. 788 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Frazier v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. 788 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
See Halla Nursery, d at 910 (when decision on motion for new trial is based on an error of law, standard of review is de novo); (holding that appellate court does not defer to district court’s decision on question of law).
Phillips v. Dolphin 776 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Phillips v. Dolphin 776 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Bryan v. Kissoon 767 N.W.2d 491 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Bryan v. Kissoon 767 N.W.2d 491 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
(“An appellate court is not bound by, and need not give deference to, the district court’s decision on a question of law.”) (citing Frost-Benco Elec.
Marriage of Fast v. Fast 766 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Marriage of Fast v. Fast 766 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“An appellate court is not bound by, and need not give deference to, the district court’s decision on a question of law.” (citing Frost-Benco Elec.
Halla Nursery, Inc. v. City of Chanhassen 763 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Halla Nursery, Inc. v. City of Chanhassen 763 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“An appellate court is not bound by, and need not give deference to, the district court’s decision on a question of law.” (citing Frost-Benco Elec.
Heino v. One 2003 Cadillac, MN License No. KFR615, VIN: 1G6KS54Y83U131208 762 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Heino v. One 2003 Cadillac, MN License No. KFR615, VIN: 1G6KS54Y83U131208 762 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“An appellate court is not bound by, and need not give deference to, the district court’s decision on a question of law.” (citing Frost-Benco Elec.
S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. v. Mensing 759 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Wilhite v. Scott County Housing & Redevelopment Authority 759 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. v. Mensing 759 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“An appellate court is not bound by, and need not give deference to, the district court’s decision on a question of law.” (citing Frost-Benco Elec.
Wilhite v. Scott County Housing & Redevelopment Authority 759 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Port Authority of St. Paul v. Rlr, Inc. 758 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Port Authority of St. Paul v. Rlr, Inc. 758 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
“An appellate court is not bound by, and need not give deference to, the district court’s decision on a question of law.” (citing Frost-Benco Elec.
Urban Ex Rel. Urban v. American Legion Post 184 695 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Urban Ex Rel. Urban v. American Legion Post 184 695 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Heine v. Simon 674 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Heine v. Simon 674 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(distinguishing between joint tortfeasors and independent or successive tortfeasors).
Wendinger v. Forst Farms, Inc. 662 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Wendinger v. Forst Farms, Inc. 662 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2003