Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Fields, 679 N.W.2d 341.

54 citing documents.

State v. Wright 686 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Wright 686 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(discussing rule that defendant forfeits right of confrontation if he wrongfully procures the absence of the witness); Minn. R. Evid.
State v. Blom 682 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2004
State v. Blom 682 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2004
(“Although appellate courts review the presence or absence of historical facts for clear error, the surrounding circumstances relevant to a Sixth Amendment determination are reviewed de novo.”); (stating that an appellate court reviews a district court’