Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Janssen v. Janssen, 331 N.W.2d 752.

78 citing documents.

Kelley v. Tracy Fire Department Relief Ass'n 390 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Kelley v. Tracy Fire Department Relief Ass'n 390 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The supreme court has held that a pension vests when it is no longer “subject to a condition of forfeiture if the employment relationship terminates before retirement.”
Marriage of Hattstrom v. Hattstrom 385 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Hattstrom v. Hattstrom 385 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
“ordering apportionment of the future benefits only if and when such benefits are paid.” (Emphasis in original.)
Marriage of Wolter v. Wolter 382 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Wolter v. Wolter 382 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Balogh v. Balogh 376 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Balogh v. Balogh 376 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
held that future benefits of a nonvested unmatured pension could be awarded pursuant to a dissolution decree but could be apportioned only if and when such benefits are paid.
Marriage of King v. King 368 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of King v. King 368 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Hortis v. Hortis 367 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Blomberg v. Blomberg 367 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Blomberg v. Blomberg 367 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Hortis v. Hortis 367 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Linderman v. Linderman 364 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Linderman v. Linderman 364 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Her interest is to be paid “as and when [Lowell] is paid his interest in the plan.” The trial court’s allocation of Lowell’s
In Re the Marriage of Quinlivan v. Quinlivan 359 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Marriage of Quinlivan v. Quinlivan 359 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Appellant asserts that the various IRA, Keogh, and pension accounts should be divided so that each party receives 50% when they commence to draw them
Marriage of Balogh v. Balogh 356 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Balogh v. Balogh 356 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
where the court considered the proper valuation of a non-vested unmatured pension.
Marriage of Kottke v. Kottke 353 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Kottke v. Kottke 353 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Miller v. Miller 352 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1984
Marriage of Miller v. Miller 352 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1984
In Re the Marriage Marshall v. Marshall 350 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Marriage Marshall v. Marshall 350 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
VanderLeest v. VanderLeest 352 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
VanderLeest v. VanderLeest 352 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The Minnesota Supreme Court faced a

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by