DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Nordstrom, 331 N.W.2d 901.

117 citing documents.

  • Friedman v. Commissioner of Public Safety 455 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Otto 451 N.W.2d 659 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Otto 451 N.W.2d 659 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    The procedure for contesting the validity of a : The proper procedure was followed in this case.
  • State v. Friedrich 436 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Friedrich 436 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Lang 432 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Lang 432 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    When the state seeks to use a prior DWI conviction to enhance the sentence for a subsequent offense, it must initially charge the defendant with “a gross misdemeanor *480 DWI based on a prior misdemeanor DWI conviction occurring within 5 years of the present offense.”
  • State v. Warren 419 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1988
  • State v. Warren 419 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1988
  • State v. Lillemo 410 N.W.2d 66 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Lillemo 410 N.W.2d 66 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Lyle 409 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Distinguished State v. Lyle 409 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Larson 409 N.W.2d 63 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Larson 409 N.W.2d 63 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    in which the Minnesota Supreme Court held: Where a defendant is unrepresented and there is no record of waiver of counsel, a prior conviction may be collaterally attacked on constitutional grounds and invalidated in a subsequent proceeding for purposes of an enhanced penalty statute, Baldasar v. Illinois
  • State v. Snyder 408 N.W.2d 708 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Snyder 408 N.W.2d 708 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Warren 407 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Warren 407 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    -05 (Minn.1983) the Minnesota supreme court held that a prior misdemeanor D.W.I.
  • State v. Vieburg 404 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Vieburg 404 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Smisek v. Commissioner of Public Safety 400 N.W.2d 766 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Smisek v. Commissioner of Public Safety 400 N.W.2d 766 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    On May 16, 1986, the prosecutor sent Smisek’s attorney a letter indicating that he would move to amend the charges from a gross misdemeanor to a misdemeanor
  • Stoffel v. Commissioner of Public Safety 393 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Stoffel v. Commissioner of Public Safety 393 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    the supreme court addressed a challenge to Minn.Stat.
  • State v. Sandmoen 390 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Sandmoen 390 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    As such, the present case is to be distinguished from a where a prior DWI conviction could not be used to enhance a subsequent DWI offense into a gross misdemeanor absent a valid waiver of counsel on the record.
  • State v. Larsen 384 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Larsen 384 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    the supreme court held that a prior uncounseled guilty plea cannot be used to convert a subsequent DWI offense into a gross misdemeanor absent a valid waiver of counsel on record.
  • State v. Edmison 379 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Edmison 379 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1985
    we held that a prior misdemeanor DWI conviction based on an uncounseled guilty plea may not be used to convert a subsequent DWI offense into a gross misdemeanor under Minn.Stat.
  • State v. Offerman 378 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Offerman 378 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • In Re the Welfare of T.S.E. 379 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • In Re the Welfare of T.S.E. 379 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    the Minnesota Supreme Court held that an uncounseled plea to a misdemeanor could not be used to enhance a subsequent offense to a gross misdemeanor absent an on-record waiver of the right to counsel.
  • State v. Grunewald 378 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Grunewald 378 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Edmison 373 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Edmison 373 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    ANALYSIS I. Appellant contends the State did not sustain its burden of showing that his prior misdemeanor convictions met constitutional standards
  • Recker v. State, Department of Public Safety 375 N.W.2d 554 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Recker v. State, Department of Public Safety 375 N.W.2d 554 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Similarly, the Minnesota Supreme Court held that: Absent [the] valid waiver on the record of defendant’s right to counsel, the misdemeanor DWI conviction based on an uncounseled plea of guilty cannot be used as the basis of a gross misdemeanor charge under section 169.121, subds.
  • State v. Clark 361 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Clark 361 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    the court held that a prior misdemeanor D.W.I.
  • State v. Hanson 360 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Stewart 360 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Stewart 360 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    ISSUE Whether, the transcript from the 1982 plea to the misdemeanor D.W.I.
  • State v. Hanson 360 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    the supreme court held that a prior uncounseled guilty plea cannot be used to convert a subsequent D.W.I.
  • State v. Hoese 359 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Hoese 359 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    At the omnibus hearing, respondent argued that the State was obligated to produce a transcript of his 1978
  • State v. Andren 358 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 1984