Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Spaeth v. City of Plymouth, 344 N.W.2d 815.
- In re Adopt K.L.L. 515 N.W.2d 618 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Matter of KLL 515 N.W.2d 618 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- In re Adopt K.L.L. 515 N.W.2d 618 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Matter of KLL 515 N.W.2d 618 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Carlson-Grefe Construction, Inc. v. Rosemount Condominium Group Partnership 474 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
Carlson-Grefe Construction, Inc. v. Rosemount Condominium Group Partnership
474 N.W.2d 405
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
103.-03(a), (e); -25 (1984) (non-appealable order does not become appeal-able by joining it to appealable order).
- Phillips-Klein Companies v. Tiffany Partnership 474 N.W.2d 370 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Phillips-Klein Companies v. Tiffany Partnership 474 N.W.2d 370 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Radloff v. First American National Bank of St. Cloud, N.A. 470 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
Radloff v. First American National Bank of St. Cloud, N.A.
470 N.W.2d 154
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-26 (Minn.1984), where a trial court retained jurisdiction to award attorney fees while the substantive issues of the case were on appeal.
- Thompson v. City of Red Wing 455 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Thompson v. City of Red Wing 455 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Seiberlich v. Burlington Northern Railroad 447 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
Seiberlich v. Burlington Northern Railroad
447 N.W.2d 896
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
The question is whether the taxation of trial costs is a matter “not affected by the judgment or order from which the appeal is taken.” the supreme court held that the trial court retained jurisdiction to enter an order awarding attorneys’ and experts’ fees, even though the case had been appealed.
- Marriage of Amatuzio v. Amatuzio 431 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Marriage of Amatuzio v. Amatuzio 431 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- David N. Volkmann Construction, Inc. v. Isaacs 428 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- David N. Volkmann Construction, Inc. v. Isaacs 428 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Fitger Brewing Co. v. State 416 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Fitger Brewing Co. v. State
416 N.W.2d 200
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Spaeth v. City of Plymouth, the supreme court stated in dicta that generally, “a landowner has no action against a government body for mere plotting or planning, without more, in anticipation of taking land.”
- State v. Dwire 409 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1987
-
State v. Dwire
409 N.W.2d 498
Minn. 1987
The purpose of this rule is to “avoid the confusion and waste of time potentially arising from having the same issue before two courts at the same time.”
- Love v. Burlington Northern, Inc. 407 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Love v. Burlington Northern, Inc. 407 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Fette v. Peterson 406 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Fette v. Peterson
406 N.W.2d 594
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-26 (Minn.1984)(award of attorney’s fees and expert’s fees under Minn.Stat.
- Davis v. City of Princeton 401 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Davis v. City of Princeton 401 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Caponi v. Carlson 392 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Caponi v. Carlson 392 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Peterson 380 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 1986
-
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Peterson
380 N.W.2d 495
Minn. 1986
The Court of Appeals’ dismissal was based in primary part on this court’s
- Hasan v. McDonald's Corp. 377 N.W.2d 472 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Hasan v. McDonald's Corp.
377 N.W.2d 472
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
108.03; -25 (Minn.1984).
- Oswalt v. County of Ramsey 371 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Oswalt v. County of Ramsey
371 N.W.2d 241
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Paul, 298 Minn. 471 , [1974] [Minn.1984]).
- LeZALLA v. State 366 N.W.2d 395 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
LeZALLA v. State
366 N.W.2d 395
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Such a result would be absurd and contrary to the principle that statutory language must be construed “to avoid reaching an absurd or unreasonable result.”
- Good Neighbor Care Center v. City of Little Canada 357 N.W.2d 159 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Good Neighbor Care Center v. City of Little Canada
357 N.W.2d 159
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
§ 645.17(1) (1982); -23 (Minn.1984).
- Welsh v. City of Orono 355 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1984
- Welsh v. City of Orono 355 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1984
- Wilson v. Ramacher 352 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1984
- Wilson v. Ramacher 352 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1984