Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Discipline of Simonson, 420 N.W.2d 903.
-
Original Jurisdiction Per Curiam
Minn. 2020
We have long noted that “[a]fter a disciplinary proceeding, [we] expe ct[] a renewed commitment to comprehensive ethical and professional behavior.”
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Paul 809 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 2012
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Paul 809 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 2012
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Anderson 759 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 2009
-
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Anderson
759 N.W.2d 892
Minn. 2009
We expect a previously disciplined attorney to demonstrate “a renewed commitment to comprehensive ethical and professional behavior.”
- In Re QFC 728 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 2007
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Q.F.C. 728 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 2007
- In Re QFC 728 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 2007
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Q.F.C. 728 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 2007
- In Re Conduct of Ginsberg 690 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2004
-
In Re Conduct of Ginsberg
690 N.W.2d 539
Minn. 2004
Rather, the purpose of lawyer discipline is “to guard the administration of justice and to protect the courts, the legal profession, and the public.” ().
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Hoedeman 620 N.W.2d 714 Minn. 2001
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Hoedeman 620 N.W.2d 714 Minn. 2001
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Stanbury 614 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 2000
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Stanbury 614 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 2000
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Harp 560 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1997
-
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Harp
560 N.W.2d 696
Minn. 1997
“The purpose of discipline is not to punish the lawyer but to guard the administration of justice and to protect the courts, the legal profession, and the public.” (citation omitted).
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Jensen 542 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1996
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Jensen 542 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1996
- Petition for Discipl. Act. Against Weems 540 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1995
- Petition for Discipl. Act. Against Weems 540 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1995
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Ruffenach 486 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1992
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Ruffenach 486 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1992
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Hunter 473 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1991
-
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Hunter
473 N.W.2d 866
Minn. 1991
Continued misconduct following disciplinary sanctions is an aggravating factor because “[a]fter a disciplinary proceeding, this court expects a renewed commitment to comprehensive ethical and professional behavior.”