Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Brown, 345 N.W.2d 233.

46 citing documents.

  • State v. Stanke 764 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 2009
  • State v. Stanke 764 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 2009
    We have previously recognized that peace officers are “highly vulnerable when engaged in the performance of their duties.”
  • State v. Evans 756 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 2008
  • State v. Evans 756 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 2008
    in which we said “[ajlthough the legislative history regarding the enactment of the peace officer statute is silent, the most evident rational basis for enacting the statute was to deter the killing of peace officers.” Angulo, d at 573 .
  • State v. Askerooth 681 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 2004
  • State v. Waddell 655 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 2003
  • State v. Waddell 655 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 2003
    In so arguing, this court adopted the holding of Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Vereb 643 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Vereb 643 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    (police had right and duty to respond to and investigate report of suspicious activity); (driver’s evasive conduct provided articulable suspicion of criminal activity to warrant stop).
  • State v. Chambers 589 N.W.2d 466 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Chambers 589 N.W.2d 466 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Varnado 582 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Yarnado 582 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Varnado 582 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1998
    (upholding a custodial arrest for a misdemeanor where officer knew that defendant had previously failed to appear for citations issued to him).
  • State v. Yarnado 582 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1998
    (upholding a custodial arrest for a misdemeanor where officer knew that defendant had previously failed to appear for citations issued to him).
  • State v. Griese 565 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Griese 565 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1997
    See, 29 (Minn.1986); *426 -32 (Minn.App.), pet.
  • State v. Williams 535 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Williams 535 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Provost 490 N.W.2d 93 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Provost 490 N.W.2d 93 Minn. 1992
    Later, defendant argued the trial court erred in refusing psychiatric opinion testimony that defendant’s intoxication from alcohol and marijuana precluded him from forming the requisite specific intent for first degree murder.
  • State v. Pilcher 472 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1991
  • State v. Pilcher 472 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1991
    While an emotionally distressed defendant should be allowed to become composed before making a confession, this concern arises where an accused’s emotional state threatens the accused’s ability to freely and voluntarily make inculpatory statements.
  • State v. Angulo 471 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Angulo 471 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    In addition, our supreme court has stated that the statute was most probably enacted to deter the killing of and to protect peace officers, “who are highly vulnerable when engaged in the performance of their duties.”
  • State v. Olson 436 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1989
  • State v. Olson 436 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1989
  • State v. Dick 419 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Dick 419 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    238 n. 2 (Minn.1984) (psychiatrist could not give expert opinion based in part on pretrial conversation with defendant, not made for purposes of diagnosis or treatment).
  • State v. Plew 745 P.2d 102 Ariz. 1987
  • State v. Yates 392 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Yates 392 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    (Bouwman II); (Bouwman I).
  • State v. Andrews 388 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Andrews 388 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1986
    we emphasized the importance of allowing an emotionally upset defendant time to become composed before making a confession.
  • State v. Lamar 382 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Lamar 382 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Huseth 375 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Huseth 375 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Budke 372 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Budke 372 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Propotnik 355 N.W.2d 195 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Propotnik 355 N.W.2d 195 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • City of Minneapolis v. Larsen 354 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • City of Minneapolis v. Larsen 354 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. St. Cyr 354 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. St. Cyr 354 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1984