Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Butler v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 348 N.W.2d 827.

24 citing documents.

Jesse M. Gregorich, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Otto v. Comm'r Safety 924 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Otto v. Comm'r Safety 924 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Safety , , 828 (Minn. App. 1984) (stating that, because a driver who is asked to do field sobriety tests is not subject to custodial interrogation, a Miranda advisory "is confusing to the driver"); see also Ruffenach v. Comm'r of Pub.
State of Minnesota v. Alexander Nathan Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Alexander Nathan Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Safety, (stating that the officer is required only to “facilitate the defendant’s right to counsel, not .
State of Minnesota v. Ashley Elizabeth Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Ashley Elizabeth Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Safety, d 827, 829 (Minn. App. 1984).
State v. Myers 711 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Rader 597 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Gergen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 548 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Gergen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 548 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
McNaughton v. Commissioner of Public Safety 536 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
McNaughton v. Commissioner of Public Safety 536 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Safety, -29 (Minn.App.1984) (officer need only allow and facilitate right to counsel and need not make sure driver has received best or even proper counsel).
Jacob v. Commissioner of Public Safety 409 N.W.2d 283 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Jacob v. Commissioner of Public Safety 409 N.W.2d 283 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
this court noted: Giving a Miranda warning, which implies there are no penalties for refusing to cooperate, in an implied consent situation, where there are substantial penalties for refusing to cooperate, is confusing to the driver.
Clough v. Commissioner of Public Safety 360 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Distinguished Clough v. Commissioner of Public Safety 360 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
where a public defender did return the officer’s phone call and spoke to the driver, although refusing to advise him whether or not to take the test.
Steinberg v. State, Department of Public Safety 357 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Steinberg v. State, Department of Public Safety 357 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
“Since an implied consent proceeding is civil, rather than criminal, in nature no Fifth Amendment right attaches.” Butler v. Commissioner of Pub *416 lic Safety, citing, Goldsworthy v. State, Department of Public Safety, n. 4 (Minn.1978).
Eveslage v. Commissioner of Public Safety 353 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Eveslage v. Commissioner of Public Safety 353 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
We have further held that: “The statute requires only that the officer allow and facilitate the defendant’s right to counsel, not that the officer make sure the defendant has received the best or even proper counsel.” Butler v. Comm’r of Public Safety, at 829 (Minn.Ct.App.1984).
State v. Kline 351 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Kline 351 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Safety, at 829 (Minn.Ct.App.1984); see South Dakota v. Neville, 459 U.S. 553 , 103 S.Ct.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by