Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Moore, 340 N.W.2d 671.

68 citing documents.

State v. Roesch 349 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Roesch 349 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
“The Hernandez method of applying defendant’s criminal history score may be used only when sentencing concurrently.”
State v. Anderson 345 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 1984
State v. Anderson 345 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 1984
State v. Raddatz 345 N.W.2d 798 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Raddatz 345 N.W.2d 798 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Dietz 344 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 1984
Kilcoyne v. State 344 N.W.2d 394 Minn. 1984
State v. Wentz 343 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1984
State v. Dietz 344 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 1984
Kilcoyne v. State 344 N.W.2d 394 Minn. 1984
State v. Wentz 343 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1984
State v. Wittig 343 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Wittig 343 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
It is not an abstract exercise, however, where the trial court denied a defense motion to consolidate eight counts of forgery in a theft of |40,000 into one count of theft.
State v. Pickett 343 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Pickett 343 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
“The Hernandez method of applying a defendant’s criminal history score may be used only when sentencing concurrently.” State of *674 at 673 (Minn.1983).
State v. Sherwood 341 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
State v. Sherwood 341 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 1983