Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Berry v. State, 364 N.W.2d 795.
- Walen v. State 777 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 2010
- Walen v. State 777 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 2010
- Cuypers v. State 711 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 2006
- Cuypers v. State 711 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 2006
- Pederson v. State 649 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 2002
-
Pederson v. State
649 N.W.2d 161
Minn. 2002
(citing State v. Wofford, 262 Minn. 112, 115 , -70 (1962)).
- Race v. State 504 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 1993
- Race v. State 504 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 1993
- Gustafson v. State 477 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1991
-
Gustafson v. State
477 N.W.2d 709
Minn. 1991
“The scope of our review in a post-conviction proceeding is limited to the question of whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain the findings of the postconviction court.” ().
- Fox v. State 474 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1991
- Fox v. State 474 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1991
- Wieland v. State 457 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1990
- Wieland v. State 457 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1990
- State v. Bliss 457 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1990
- State v. Bliss 457 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1990
- Daniels v. State 447 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1989
-
Daniels v. State
447 N.W.2d 187
Minn. 1989
State v. Meldahl, 310 Minn. 136, 138
- State v. Blasus 445 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1989
- State v. Blasus 445 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1989
- State v. Merrill 428 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1988
- State v. Merrill 428 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1988
- Race v. State 417 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 1987
- Race v. State 417 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 1987
- Dye v. State 411 N.W.2d 897 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Dye v. State 411 N.W.2d 897 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Bingham 406 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Bingham 406 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Hole 400 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Hole 400 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Sanders v. State 400 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Sanders v. State
400 N.W.2d 175
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The standards on review of a denial of a post-conviction petition seeking a : The decision whether to grant a new trial based upon newly-discovered evidence rests with the trial court and will not be disturbed unless there is an abuse of discretion.
- State v. Rothering 397 N.W.2d 346 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Rothering 397 N.W.2d 346 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Holmes v. State 394 N.W.2d 818 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Holmes v. State 394 N.W.2d 818 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Norregaard 380 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Norregaard 380 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Smith 380 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Smith 380 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Coulthard 379 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Coulthard 379 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Shannon v. State 379 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Shannon v. State 379 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Harmening 376 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Harmening 376 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 1985