Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Linderman v. Linderman, 364 N.W.2d 872.

37 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Lynn Desiree Wallace v. Christopher Michael Wallace Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Lynn Desiree Wallace v. Christopher Michael Wallace Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Long v. Creighton 670 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Long v. Creighton 670 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(noting cases involving split physical custody can render mechanical application of the child-support guidelines improper).
Marriage of Wiegers v. Wiegers 467 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Swick v. Swick 467 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Swick v. Swick 467 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
5; Nardini, d at 193-94 (cash dividends from stock); (interest earned from nonmarital certificates of deposit); (interest earned from stock debentures); Rosenberg, d at 583 (stock proceeds); -77 (Minn.App.1985) (rental income); (farm rental income).
Marriage of Wiegers v. Wiegers 467 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Mancuso v. Mancuso 417 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Mancuso v. Mancuso 417 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Griffith v. Griffith 415 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Wolter v. Wolter 395 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Wolter v. Wolter 395 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
d at 863 ; (“the statutory guidelines are not to be applied mechanically”).
Marriage of Swalstad v. Swalstad 394 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Swalstad v. Swalstad 394 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(where parents split custody, wife with excess resources was required to be sole support of children in her custody).
Marriage of Haaland v. Haaland 392 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Haaland v. Haaland 392 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Moore v. Moore 391 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Ellefson v. Anderson 391 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Ellefson v. Anderson 391 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Moore v. Moore 391 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
19, 1986) (proceeds from sale of stock not attributable to appreciation); (farm land rental income); (farm land rental income).
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 388 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 388 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Campion, d at 5 (apartment building rentals); Rosenberg, d at 583 (the recognized part of stock value attributed to earnings of the stockholder); (applying the rule to farm land rentals); -77 (Minn.Ct.App.1985) (farm land rentals).
Marriage of Malecha v. Malecha 386 N.W.2d 292 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Wende v. Wende 386 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Malecha v. Malecha 386 N.W.2d 292 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
the father had custody of two children and the mother of one minor child.
Wende v. Wende 386 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
the father was awarded custody of the two oldest children and the mother was awarded custody of the youngest child.
Marriage of Riley v. Riley 385 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Riley v. Riley 385 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Pitkin v. Gross 385 N.W.2d 367 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Pitkin v. Gross 385 N.W.2d 367 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Hoppenrath v. Cullen 383 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Hoppenrath v. Cullen 383 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Kelly v. Kelly 374 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Kelly v. Kelly 374 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
“In the absence of abuse of its broad discretion on the subject, the decision of the trial court must be affirmed.”
Scott v. Scott 373 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Scott v. Scott 373 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 1985

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by