DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Rud, 359 N.W.2d 573.

112 citing documents.

  • State v. Skjefte 428 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Skjefte 428 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Case 412 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Case 412 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    The adversarial preliminary hearing to determine probable cause became obsolete upon the adoption of rule 11.03, and the supreme court has already determined the rule to be constitutional.
  • State v. Mussehl 408 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 1987
  • State v. Mussehl 408 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 1987
    578 n. 1 (1984), while holding in part that the rules do not provide for discovery depositions in criminal cases, we stated: A criminal defendant has a right to attempt to interview the victims without interference from the prosecution.
  • State v. Torkelson 404 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Torkelson 404 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Crawford 394 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Crawford 394 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • City of Bemidji v. Harr 368 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • City of Bemidji v. Harr 368 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    1 and Comment; , 578 n. 1 (Minn.1984).