Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Rinker v. Rinker, 358 N.W.2d 165.

56 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Nicole Marie Anne Sanders, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: James Walter Shaw v. Barbara Ann Shaw Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: James Walter Shaw v. Barbara Ann Shaw Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Minnesota courts have repeatedly recognized that it is “unfortunate” to separate children, and such separations are “carefully scrutinized.” See Schultz v. Schultz, 266 Minn. 205, 208, (stating that it was “unfortunate that the children are not living together under one roof with either parent”); (discussing split-custody decisions).
In re the Marriage of: Moslais X. Vue v. Khue Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Moslais X. Vue v. Khue Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Anne Elizabeth Castle-Heaney v. Bruce Edward Heaney Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Anne Elizabeth Castle-Heaney v. Bruce Edward Heaney Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“While split custody decisions may be made within the discretion of the [district] court, they are viewed as unfortunate and are carefully scrutinized.” (quotation omitted)).
Vangsness v. Vangsness 607 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Vangsness v. Vangsness 607 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Marriage of Keith v. Keith 429 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Keith v. Keith 429 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Sefkow v. Sefkow 413 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Sefkow v. Sefkow 413 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Imdieke v. Imdieke 411 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Imdieke v. Imdieke 411 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
“While split custody decisions may be made within the discretion of the trial court, they are viewed as ‘unfortunate’ and are carefully scrutinized.” (quoting Schultz v. Schultz, 266 Minn. 205, 208 , ).
Marriage of Eckman v. Eckman 410 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Eckman v. Eckman 410 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-68 (Minn.Ct.App.1984) (citations omitted).
Marriage of Roehrdanz v. Roehrdanz 410 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Roehrdanz v. Roehrdanz 410 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Although the trial court has discretion to split custody of children, such decisions “are viewed as ‘unfortunate’ and are carefully scrutinized.” (quoting Schultz v. Schultz, 266 Minn. 205, 208 , ).
Marriage of Mowers v. Mowers 406 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Mowers v. Mowers 406 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
“When examining the record, we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the court’s findings.”
Marriage of Kennedy v. Kennedy 403 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Kennedy v. Kennedy 403 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Lossing v. Lossing 403 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Lossing v. Lossing 403 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Tanghe v. Tanghe 400 N.W.2d 389 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Tanghe v. Tanghe 400 N.W.2d 389 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wenndt v. Wenndt 398 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Wilkus-Schmidt-Hight v. Wilkus 398 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Wenndt v. Wenndt 398 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
When examining the record, we must view the evidence “in the light most favorable to the court’s findings.”
Wilkus-Schmidt-Hight v. Wilkus 398 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Greenlaw v. Greenlaw 396 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Greenlaw v. Greenlaw 396 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The statute “requires a showing of actual endangerment.” ().
Larson v. Hendrickson 394 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Larson v. Hendrickson 394 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hansen v. Hansen, 284 Minn. 1, 5
Home Mutual Insurance Co. v. Chicos 394 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Home Mutual Insurance Co. v. Chicos 394 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hansen v. Hansen, 284 Minn. 1
Wilson v. Saetre 393 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Wilson v. Saetre 393 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Chafin v. Rude 391 N.W.2d 882 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Chafin v. Rude 391 N.W.2d 882 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bjerke v. Wilcox 384 N.W.2d 250 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bjerke v. Wilcox 384 N.W.2d 250 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Meier v. Connelly 378 N.W.2d 812 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Meier v. Connelly 378 N.W.2d 812 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Jones v. Jones 377 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Jones v. Jones 377 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hansen v. Hansen, 284 Minn. 1, 5
Marriage of Kennedy v. Kennedy 376 N.W.2d 702 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Sefkow v. Sefkow 372 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Sefkow v. Sefkow 372 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Schultz v. Schultz, 266 Minn. 205, 208