Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Burniece v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co., 398 N.W.2d 542.

27 citing documents.

Minn. 2022
Aaron Wesser, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Allan Fishel, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Co. , (quotation omitted) .
American Family Insurance Group v. Kiess 697 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 2005
American Family Insurance Group v. Kiess 697 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 2005
Co., (stating that the interest statute is intended to compensate insureds for the use of their funds and encourage prompt payment of benefits).
American Family Insurance Group v. Kiess 680 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
American Family Insurance Group v. Kiess 680 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
McGoff v. AMCO Insurance Co. 575 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
McGoff v. AMCO Insurance Co. 575 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Nelson v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 538 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Nelson v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 538 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Co., (citing Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Indus., 783 F.2d 743 , 752 (8th Cir.1986) and interpreting Minn.Stat.
Great West Casualty Co. v. Barnick 542 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Great West Casualty Co. v. Barnick 542 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 498 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 498 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Co., see also Stinson v. Clark Equip.
Zaretsky v. Molecular Biosystems, Inc. 464 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Zaretsky v. Molecular Biosystems, Inc. 464 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Johnson v. Kromhout 444 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Johnson v. Kromhout 444 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co. 438 N.W.2d 701 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co. 438 N.W.2d 701 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
The purpose of the interest is to compensate the insured and “to punish insurance companies for their failure to pay proceeds on time and to motivate them to pay on time.” reversed on other grounds
Peck v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 404 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Peck v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 404 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Motschenbacher v. New Hampshire Insurance Group 402 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Motschenbacher v. New Hampshire Insurance Group 402 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
rev'g, the supreme court held that interest on overdue basic economic loss benefits under Minn. Stat. §.