Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Johnson v. Urie, 405 N.W.2d 887.

40 citing documents.

AgCountry Farm Credit Services, ACA, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Graff v. Robert M. Swendra Agency, Inc. 800 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 2011
Graff v. Robert M. Swendra Agency, Inc. 800 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 2011
b (2006) (stating that an agent generally "is subject to liability to a third party harmed by the agent’s tortious conduct,” even when the agent’s conduct may also subject the principal to liability); see, (noting that “we have previously recognized that under certain circumstances an insurance agent may be liable in negligence” for failure to use reasonable care); Melady v. S. St.
Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Transport Leasing/Contract, Inc. 671 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Transport Leasing/Contract, Inc. 671 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
13, 1987); Johnson v. Urie, *72 affd
Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 616 N.W.2d 732 Minn. 2000
Lubbers v. Anderson 524 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Lubbers v. Anderson 524 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
846, 849 (Minn.App.1986), aff'd
Mueller v. Theis 512 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Mueller v. Theis 512 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Porta-Mix Concrete, Inc. v. First Insurance East Grand Forks 512 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Porta-Mix Concrete, Inc. v. First Insurance East Grand Forks 512 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See, (a duty to “offer, advise or furnish insurance coverage” may arise from the “circumstances of the transaction and the relationship of the agent vis-a-vis the insured”); Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western Nat’l Mut.
Reitzner v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 510 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Reitzner v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 510 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Carlson v. Mutual Service Insurance 494 N.W.2d 885 Minn. 1993
Carlson v. Mutual Service Insurance 494 N.W.2d 885 Minn. 1993
Beauty Craft Supply & Equipment Co. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 479 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Beauty Craft Supply & Equipment Co. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 479 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Corazalla v. Quie 473 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Corazalla v. Quie 473 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(summary judgment inappropriate absent facts on circumstances surrounding relationship that might give rise to duty).
HIGGINS ON BEHALF OF HIGGINS v. Winter 474 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
HIGGINS ON BEHALF OF HIGGINS v. Winter 474 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(under “appropriate circumstances” insurance agent may have a duty to advise insured of additional optional coverages); Osendorf v. American Family Ins.
Writers, Inc. v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. 465 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Writers, Inc. v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. 465 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Rudnitski v. Seely 441 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Rudnitski v. Seely 441 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(if allegations in complaint can be established by competent evidence, a duty may arise; thus summary judgment based only on the pleadings was inappropriate); (motion for judgment on the pleadings should be granted only if pleadings c
Gabrielson v. Warnemunde 443 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1989
Gabrielson v. Warnemunde 443 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1989
891 n. 5 (Minn.1987); W. Prosser, R. Keeton, The Law of Torts § 37 p. 236 (5th ed.) (1984); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 328B (1965).
Gabrielson v. Warnemunde 430 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Gabrielson v. Warnemunde 430 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Thus, the insurance agent’s duty depends on the “circumstances of the transaction and the relationship of the agent vis-a-vis the insured.”
Born v. Medico Life Insurance Co. 428 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Born v. Medico Life Insurance Co. 428 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
The party claiming negligence “has the burden of establishing a duty on the part of [the insurer], along with establishing the standard of care to be followed by insurer and agent in fulfilling that duty.” aff'd
Campbell v. Insurance Service Agency 424 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Campbell v. Insurance Service Agency 424 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Reedon of Faribault, Inc. v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. 418 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1988
Reedon of Faribault, Inc. v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. 418 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1988
.This is not a wherein we found a duty arising as a result of the relationship between the agent and the insured.
Campbell v. Valley State Agency 407 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Campbell v. Valley State Agency 407 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(no offer or advice concerning under-insured motorists coverage).