Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Occupational License of Hutchinson, 440 N.W.2d 171.

44 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Appeal by Hawa Abdulle, Ayan Home Health Care, LLC, and Hawa Abdulle Adult … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Appeal by Hawa Abdulle, Ayan Home Health Care, LLC, and Hawa Abdulle Adult … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
But when an agency departs from the ALJ’s credibility findings, the court reviews the agency’s findings “more critically.” rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Appeal of Maren Erickson for Maltreatment of a Minor Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Appeal of Maren Erickson for Maltreatment of a Minor Minn. Ct. App. 2024
itself act[ed] as an appellate tribunal with respect to the agency decision, this court will independently review the agency’s record.”
In re the Matter of: Talea Glesener, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(citations and quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Appeal by Amy Waters of the Maltreatment Determination and Disqualification, and by John … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A19-0118 A19-0124 A20-1271 A20-1380 A20-1385 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re Hutchinson , rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
Target Corporation, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 171, 177 (Minn. App. 1989), review denied (Minn. Aug.
A Resolution Setting Forth Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Denying S. M. Hentges & … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See In re Hutchinson , (“Agency decisions are presumed to be correct by reviewing courts, and will be reversed only when they reflect an error of law or when the findings are arbitrary and capricious or unsupported by substantive evidence.”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Duluth Landfill Superior LLC v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Duluth Landfill Superior LLC v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Minn. Ct. App. 2016
But “[w]here the [district] court reviewing an agency decision makes independent factual determinations and otherwise acts as a court of first impression, this court applies the clearly erroneous standard of review.” (citations and quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Findings of Maltreatment and Disqualification of R. M. M. v. State of Minnesota, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Findings of Maltreatment and Disqualification of R. M. M. v. State of Minnesota, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DECISION When “the [district] court is itself acting as an appellate tribunal with respect to the agency decision, this court will independently review the agency’s record.” (quotations omitted), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Beth Ann Balenger v. State of Minnesota, Department of Health Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Beth Ann Balenger v. State of Minnesota, Department of Health Minn. Ct. App. 2015
DECISION Where “the [district] court is itself acting as an appellate tribunal with respect to the agency decision, this court will independently review the agency’s record.” (quotations and citations omitted), 3 review denied (Minn. Aug.
In Re the Expulsion of N.Y.B. 750 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Expulsion of N.Y.B. 750 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
(distinguishing high level of deference given to district court reviewing agency decision when district court “acts as a court of first *324 impression” from de novo review conducted when district court is “itself acting as an appellate tribunal with respect to the agency decision”), review denied
Uckun v. Minnesota State Board of Medical Practice 733 N.W.2d 778 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Uckun v. Minnesota State Board of Medical Practice 733 N.W.2d 778 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
the [district] court is itself acting as an appellate tribunal with respect to the agency decision, this court will independently review the agency’s record.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
Fine v. Bernstein 726 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Fine v. Bernstein 726 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
review denied (Minn. Aug.
Shagalow v. State, Department of Human Services 725 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Shagalow v. State, Department of Human Services 725 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
“Agency decisions are presumed to be correct by reviewing courts....” review denied (Minn. Aug.
Max Schwartzman & Sons v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 670 N.W.2d 746 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Max Schwartzman & Sons v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 670 N.W.2d 746 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
See, e.g., Saif Food Market v. Comm’r, State, Dep’t of Health, (finding that substantial evidence supported the commissioner’s decision); review denied (Minn. Aug.
Improvement of County Ditch No. 86, Branch 1, County of Blue Earth v. Phillips 614 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Improvement of County Ditch No. 86, Branch 1, County of Blue Earth v. Phillips 614 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(quotation and citations omitted), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Madison v. Commissioner of Public Safety 585 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Matter of University of Minnesota 566 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Matter of University of Minnesota 566 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
review denied (Minn. Aug.
Casper v. ITASCA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES 531 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Casper v. ITASCA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES 531 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(citations omitted), pet.
Dullard v. Minnesota Dept. of Human Services 529 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Dullard v. Minnesota Dept. of Human Services 529 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Gray v. Hauschildt 528 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Gray v. Hauschildt 528 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
“A statute whose meaning is plain must be given effect without further scrutiny.” pet.
State Ex Rel. Holecek v. Ross 472 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Kulla v. McNulty 472 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Kulla v. McNulty 472 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
“A statute whose meaning is plain must be given effect without further scrutiny.” pet.
State Ex Rel. Holecek v. Ross 472 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Knopp v. Gutterman, 258 Minn. 33, 40 , pet.
Bal, Inc. v. City of St. Paul 469 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Bal, Inc. v. City of St. Paul 469 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Evenson v. City of Saint Paul Board of Appeals 467 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Evenson v. City of Saint Paul Board of Appeals 467 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1991