Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Reuter v. City of New Hope, 449 N.W.2d 745.
- Semler v. Klang 743 N.W.2d 273 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
-
Semler v. Klang
743 N.W.2d 273
Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Mere allegations of malice are not sufficient to support a finding of malice, as such a finding must be based on “specific facts evidencing bad faith.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
- Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. v. City of Minnetrista 713 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- Brown v. City of Bloomington 706 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-
Brown v. City of Bloomington
706 N.W.2d 519
Minn. Ct. App. 2005
because of me trying to hurt myself.” While she also stated that she felt the firing of the second round was “malicious,” a plaintiff “may not rely on ‘bare allegations of malice’ to defeat a summary judgment, but must present specific facts evidencing bad faith.” (Minn.App.
- Bailey v. City of St. Paul 678 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-
Bailey v. City of St. Paul
678 N.W.2d 697
Minn. Ct. App. 2004
review denied (Minn. Feb.
- Kelly v. City of Minneapolis 581 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
Kelly v. City of Minneapolis
581 N.W.2d 372
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
s, , 149 n. 1 (Minn.App.1994) (Minnesota police officer who collided with another motorist while pursuing suspect into North Dakota protected by official immunity); (police officers immune from suit for consequences of responding to allegedly fabricated 911 call), review denied (Minn. July 27, 1994); (plaintiffs may not rely on bare allegations of malice to defeat application of official immunity and must “present specific facts evidencing bad faith”), review denied (Minn. Feb.
- Gleason v. Metropolitan Council Transit Operations 563 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-
Gleason v. Metropolitan Council Transit Operations
563 N.W.2d 309
Minn. Ct. App. 1997
10, 1993); review denied (Minn. Feb.
- Mjolsness v. Riley 524 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Mjolsness v. Riley
524 N.W.2d 528
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(doctors who acted in good faith and complied with provisions for emergency commitment were immune from liability even though subject of emergency commitment never was committed); (police officers entitled to qualified immunity under 42 U.S.C.
- Duellman v. Erwin 522 N.W.2d 377 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Duellman v. Erwin 522 N.W.2d 377 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Leonzal v. Grogan 516 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Leonzal v. Grogan 516 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Stone v. Badgerow 511 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Stone v. Badgerow
511 N.W.2d 747
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
But once the official raises qualified immunity, the plaintiff “must" establish that the [official’s] action was objectively legally unreasonable.” pet.
- Johnson v. County of Dakota 510 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Johnson v. County of Dakota 510 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- McDonough v. City of Rosemount 503 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Soucek v. Banham 503 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- McDonough v. City of Rosemount 503 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Soucek v. Banham 503 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Maras v. City of Brainerd 502 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Maras v. City of Brainerd 502 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. City of Mounds View 498 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. City of Mounds View
498 N.W.2d 503
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
See, e.g., Pletan, d at 41 (wrongful death action); Elwood, d at 679 (trespass and battery claims); (assault and false imprisonment), pet.
- S.L.D. v. Kranz 498 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- S.L.D. v. Kranz 498 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- McGovern v. City of Minneapolis 480 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
McGovern v. City of Minneapolis
480 N.W.2d 121
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
at 675; (issue of qualified immunity is appropriately resolved on summary judgment); (summary judgment is the most appropriate means for addressing issue of qualified immunity), pet.