Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc., 483 N.W.2d 701.

42 citing documents.

Barbara Henry, Minn. 2023
Res., – 73 (Minn. 2022) ; Feges v. Perkins Rests., Inc., –11 (Minn. 1992) (applying McDonnell Douglas to an age discrimination claim under the Human Rights Act).
Shanon Renee Harper, DNP, NP v. Dr. Jennifer Tessmer-Tuck, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“[A]n employee handbook may constitute terms of an employment contract if (1) the terms are definite in form; (2) the terms are communicated to the employee; (3) the offer is accepted by the employee; and (4) consideration is given.” Feges v. Perkins Rests., Inc.
Vicki Metcalf v. Allina Health System Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“The reason must be offered by admissible evidence, be of a character to justify a judgment for the defendant, and must be clear and reasonably specific enough to enable the plaintiff to rebut the proffered reason as pretextual.” Feges v. Perkins Rests., Inc., (stating employee’s “substandard and erratic performance as a manager” 15 were legitimate and nondiscriminatory reason s for discharge); see also Hoover, d at 545 ( discharging employee because her “files failed to comply with internal pol
Minn. 2021
See also Feges v. Perkins Rests., Inc., d 701, 707 (Minn. 1992) (“[A]n employee handbook may constitute terms of an employment contract if (1) the terms are definite in form; (2) the terms are communicated to the employee; (3) the offer is accepted by the employee; and (4) consideration is given.”).
Timothy Wodarck v. Lakota Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In reaching its decision, the district court relied on Ray v. Miller Meester Advert., Inc., -08 (Minn. 2004), and Feges v. Perkins Rests., Inc. , to conclude 3 that the award of lost future earning capacity was unsupported as a matter of law .
Moore v. City of New Brighton 932 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Moore v. City of New Brighton 932 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Sigurdson v. Isanti County , , 720 (Minn. 1986) (quotation omitted); cf. Feges v. Perkins Rests., Inc. , , 711 (Minn. 1992) ("Perkins'[s] proffered reasons for its decision to fire Feges were capable of being exposed as pretext and Feges made a valiant attempt to do so [at trial].").
Stagg v. Vintage Place Inc. 796 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 2011
Coursolle v. EMC Insurance Group, Inc. 794 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Coursolle v. EMC Insurance Group, Inc. 794 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
“[A]n employee handbook may constitute terms of an employment contract if (1) the terms are definite in form; (2) the terms are communicated to the employee; (3) the offer is accepted by the employee; and (4) consideration is given.” Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc.
Roberts v. Brunswick Corp. 783 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Roberts v. Brunswick Corp. 783 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
“[A]n employee handbook may constitute terms of an employment contract if (1) the terms are definite in form; (2) the terms are communicated to the employee; (3) the offer is accepted by the employee; and (4) consideration is given.” Feges v. Perkins Rests., Inc.
Alexandria Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Rost 756 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Alexandria Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Rost 756 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
“[A]n employee handbook may constitute terms of an employment contract if (1) the terms are definite in form; (2) the terms are communicated to the employee; (3) the offer is accepted by the employee; and (4) consideration is given.” Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc.
Kluball v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 706 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Kluball v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 706 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
See, e.g., Feges v. Perkins Rests., Inc., (noting that whether an employee rebutted response offered by an employer for firing the employee presents a question of fact).
Riley Bros. Construction, Inc. v. Shuck 704 N.W.2d 197 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Riley Bros. Construction, Inc. v. Shuck 704 N.W.2d 197 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Feges v. Perkins Rests., Inc., (stating that ability to accept an offer is lost if the offer is revoked at any time before the offer is accepted); Stone v. Harmon, 31 Minn. 512, 515 , 19 N.W.
Ray v. Miller Meester Advertising, Inc. 684 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 2004
Ray v. Miller Meester Advertising, Inc. 684 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 2004
“In employment contracts, the general rule is that ‘[t]he measure of damages for breach of an employment contract is the compensation which an employee who has been wrongfully discharged would have received had the contract been carried out according to its terms.’ ” Feges v. Perkins Rests., Inc., (quoting Zeller v. Prior Lake Pub.
Goins v. West Group 635 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 2001
Goins v. West Group 635 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 2001
Hoover v. Norwest Private Mortgage Banking 632 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 2001
Hoover v. Norwest Private Mortgage Banking 632 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 2001
Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc., -11 (Minn.1992); see also Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co., (“As the result of the substantial similarities existing between Title VII and [the MHRA], we have frequently applied principles which have evolved in the adjudication of claims under the federal act, and, spec
Hoover v. Norwest Private Mortgage Banking 605 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Hoover v. Norwest Private Mortgage Banking 605 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
See, e.g., Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc., Isanti County, d at 720 .
Diez v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing 564 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Diez v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing 564 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc., , 710 n. 4 (Minn.1992).
Phong Thi Doan v. Medtronic, Inc. 560 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Phong Thi Doan v. Medtronic, Inc. 560 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
see also Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc., (third prong of McDonnell Douglas test requires plaintiff to show proffered reason was pretext for discrimination or not worthy of belief).
Dietrich v. Canadian Pacific Ltd. 536 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1995
Dietrich v. Canadian Pacific Ltd. 536 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1995
Sigurdson, d at 720 ; see also Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc.
Hasnudeen v. Onan Corp. 531 N.W.2d 891 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Hasnudeen v. Onan Corp. 531 N.W.2d 891 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc., (citing McDonnell Douglas, 411 U.S. at 802 , 93 S.Ct.
Johnson v. Canadian Pacific Ltd. 522 N.W.2d 386 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Johnson v. Canadian Pacific Ltd. 522 N.W.2d 386 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
The court relied largely on Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc., rev’d in part on other grounds
Phelps v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co. 520 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Phelps v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co. 520 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Brown v. Tonka Corp. 519 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Brown v. Tonka Corp. 519 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
*478 See Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc., (employer must communicate offer to employee whom offer addresses)..
Ward v. Employee Development Corp. 516 N.W.2d 198 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Ward v. Employee Development Corp. 516 N.W.2d 198 Minn. Ct. App. 1994