Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Pilcher, 472 N.W.2d 327.

114 citing documents.

State v. Jacobson 681 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
10 Minnesota Practice, CRIMJIG 7.03 (1999); (encouraging the use of this instruction over other instruction language).
State v. Al-Naseer 678 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Al-Naseer 678 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Bailey 677 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 2004
In Re the Welfare of B.R.C. 675 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Welfare of B.R.C. 675 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Dukes v. State 660 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 2003
Dukes v. State 660 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 2003
See, e.g., Dukes II, d at 254 ; (concluding defendant acquiesced to concessions); (concluding defendant’s immediate objection to the concessions proved lack of consent or acquiescence); , 480 n. 3 (Minn.1989) (citing Wiplinger as an example of an error that
State v. Jorgensen 660 N.W.2d 127 Minn. 2003
State v. Jorgensen 660 N.W.2d 127 Minn. 2003
State v. Conger 652 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 2002
State v. Conger 652 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 2002
-33 (Minn.1991); , 224 n. 5 (Minn.1988).
State v. Pippitt 645 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 2002
State v. Pippitt 645 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 2002
State v. Marshall 642 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Marshall 642 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re the Welfare of D.B.X. 638 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re the Welfare of D.B.X. 638 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Torres 632 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2001
State v. Torres 632 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2001
Judges Ass’n, Minnesota Practice —Jury Instruction Guides, Criminal, CRIMJIG 7.03 (4th ed.1999); (encouraging the use of this instruction over other instruction language).
Dukes v. State 621 N.W.2d 246 Minn. 2001
Dukes v. State 621 N.W.2d 246 Minn. 2001
State v. Ritt 599 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1999
State v. Ritt 599 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1999
A statement is involuntary if police actions were so coercive, manipulative and overpowering as to “deprivef] [a suspect] of his ability to make an unconstrained and wholly autonomous decision to speak as he did.”
State v. Profit 591 N.W.2d 451 Minn. 1999
State v. Profit 591 N.W.2d 451 Minn. 1999
Rather, “[t]he requisite plan to commit first degree murder can be formulated virtually instantaneously.”
State v. Tibiatowski 590 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1999
State v. Tibiatowski 590 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1999
State v. Harris 589 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1999
State v. Harris 589 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1999
State v. Parker 585 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1998
State v. Parker 585 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1998
State v. Hough 571 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Hough 571 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(holding that use of “sympathetic” approach does not, in itself, render statements involuntary).
State v. Miller 573 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1998
State v. Miller 573 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1998
State v. Riley 568 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1997
State v. Riley 568 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1997
State v. Jones 566 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1997
State v. Jones 566 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1997
The test of voluntariness is whether the actions of the police, together with other circumstances surrounding the interrogation “were so coercive, so manipulative, so overpowering that [the defendant] was deprived of his ability to make an unconstrained and wholly autonomous decision to speak as he did.”
State v. Griese 565 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1997
State v. Griese 565 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1997
State v. Mills 562 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1997
State v. Mills 562 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1997
State v. Wallace 558 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1997
State v. Wallace 558 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1997
-59 (Minn.1991) (reviewing a conviction based entirely on circumstantial evidence and requiring a reasonable inference other than guilt); 78 (Minn.1985) (requiring th
In Re the Welfare of G. (NMN) M. 542 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of G. (NMN) M. 542 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Wilson 535 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 1995
State v. Wilson 535 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 1995
711 n. 4 (Minn.1989); , 224 n. 5 (Minn.1988).