Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Scott, 501 N.W.2d 608.

30 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(citing State v. Scott , ).
In the Matter of the Welfare of: C.A.W., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In determining whethe r a child is competent to test ify, a district court must first determine “whether the child remembers or can relate events truthfully.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In determining whether a child is competent to testify, a district court must determine “whether the child remembers or can relate events truthfully.” (quoting State v. Lanam , -60 (Minn. 1990)).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(citing Kentucky v. Stincer, 482 U.S. 730, 741 -42, 107 S. Ct. 2658, 2665-66 (1987)).
State of Minnesota v. Edgar Arturo Cano-Fernandez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Edgar Arturo Cano-Fernandez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
1(n) (2014); (noting prior presumption that children under age ten were not competent to testify).
State v. Munt 831 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 2013
State v. Munt 831 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 2013
To determine whether the child is competent to testify, the district court must “test whether the child has the ability to relate events truthfully.” (-60 (Minn.1990)).
State v. Sanders 775 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 2009
State v. Sanders 775 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 2009
State v. Sime 669 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Sime 669 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Bauer 598 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 1999
State v. Shoen 598 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1999
State v. Shoen 598 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1999
Following these cases, we too have stated that "a finding of constitutional error in a criminal trial does not require a new trial if the state can show beyond a reasonable doubt that the error was harmless.” Jones, d at 910 (emphasis added); (citing Chapman, 386 U.S. at 24 , 87 S.Ct.
State v. Bauer 598 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 1999
802; -17 (citing Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805 , 110 S.Ct.
In Re the Welfare of L.E.P. 594 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 1999
In Re the Welfare of L.E.P. 594 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 1999
however, we held that statements made by a 9-year-old to a deputy were not admissible under 803(24) when the deputy used leading questions indicating that he may have had a preconceived notion about what the child would say, there was nothing in the record to indicate the child did not have a motive to fa
State v. Danforth 573 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Danforth 573 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Byers 554 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Byers 554 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(a district court’s violation of the confrontation clause is subject to harmless error analysis); (applying harmless error analysis to court’s admission of hearsay).
State v. Jones 556 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1996
State v. Jones 556 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1996
(citing Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct.
State v. Salazar 504 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1993
State v. Salazar 504 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1993
State v. Goldenstein 505 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Goldenstein 505 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1993