Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Chaklos, 528 N.W.2d 225.

97 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. David Arthur Barnes Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Darren Clinton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Darren Clinton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Daron A-Saad Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Daron A-Saad Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that, generally, the offender-related factor of particular unamenability to treatment in a probationary setting may be used to justify a dispositional departure, but not an upward durational departure, while offense-related aggravating factors may be used to support both a dispositional
State of Minnesota v. Misty Dawn Dyrdahl Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Misty Dawn Dyrdahl Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Parnard Smith, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Shannon Marie Kiesner Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Shannon Marie Kiesner Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Parnard Smith, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Baruch Kefa Nieznanski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Bradley James Schnickel Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Baruch Kefa Nieznanski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Bradley James Schnickel Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Wayne Regguinti Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason David Fredrickson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason David Fredrickson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-27 (Minn. 1995) (upholding consecutive sentencing when defendant hit victim’s car while intoxicated, killing one woman and severely injuring another).
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Wayne Regguinti Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(), review denied 10 (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. President Pimping Austin Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. President Pimping Austin Minn. Ct. App. 2014
But “there may be cases in which the defendant’s lack of remorse could relate back and be considered as evidence bearing on a determination of the cruelty or seriousness of the conduct on which the conviction was based.” n.1 (Minn. 1984); see, (“[T]he sentencing court may take into consideration the offense-related conduct of trying to pin the blame for the offense on someone else.”).
State of Minnesota v. Kanishka Shereal Molina Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Kanishka Shereal Molina Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that “the offender-related factor of particular unamenability to [probation] may be used to justify a dispositional departure” but that “offense-related aggravating factors may be used to support” both dispositional and durational departures); (Minn.
State v. Peter 825 N.W.2d 126 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Peter 825 N.W.2d 126 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(“As a general rule, the offender-related factor of particular unamenability to treatment in a probationary setting ...
Dillon v. State 781 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Dillon v. State 781 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Black v. State 725 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Black v. State 725 N.W.2d 772 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Allen 706 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 2005
State v. Allen 706 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 2005
State v. Saue 688 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Saue 688 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Hanf 687 N.W.2d 659 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Hanf 687 N.W.2d 659 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Watkins 650 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Watkins 650 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Gebeck 635 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Gebeck 635 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
the court-identified several factors that would “objectively justify” a departure in a criminal-vehicular-homicide case: a very high alcohol concentration, driving without insurance, and trying to pin blame for the offense on someone else.
State v. Folkers 581 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1998
State v. Folkers 581 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1998
(concealment of the victim’s body shows particular cruelty and is an appropriate aggravating circumstance justifying departure); , 806 n. 1 (Minn.1984) (generally, lack of remorse not a factor, but in some cases may be considered as evidence of cruelty or seriousness of the conduct); (trying to blame someone else for the offense charged is appropriate consideration for upward departure).
State v. Behl 573 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Behl 573 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Likewise, the supreme court stated: As a general rule, the offender-related factor of particular unamenability to treatment in a probationary setting may be used to justify a dispositional departure in the form of execution of a presumptive-stayed sentence but may not be used to support an upward durational departu
State v. Folkers 562 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Folkers 562 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See, (affirming upward departure where defendant tried to “pin the blame” for offense on other person); (recognizing defendant’s transportation of victim’s body in car trunk related to particular cruelty of offense), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State v. VanZee 547 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. VanZee 547 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1996