Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite HB by and Through Clark v. Whittemore, 552 N.W.2d 705.

46 citing documents.

Joe Schafer, et al., as Parents and Natural Guardians of Minor W.S., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Jane Doe, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 705, 707 (Minn. 1996).
Meagan Abel, Minn. 2020
Meagan Abel, Appellant, vs. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, et al., Respondents, St. Mary's University Minnesota, Respondent. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Warren v. Dinter 926 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 2019
Fenrich v. Blake Sch. 920 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2018
, A17-2080, A17-2081, A18-0015 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Clark v. Whittemore , d 705, 707 (Minn. 1996).
Fenrich v. Blake School 901 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Fenrich v. Blake School 901 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Fred Newell v. Timothy Eide, and third party v. Norcostco, Inc., Third Party Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Fred Newell v. Timothy Eide, and third party v. Norcostco, Inc., Third Party Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-09 (Minn. 1996) (concluding there was not a special relationship requiring trailer park supervisor to protect victimized children from further sexual assault by park resident); Donaldson, d at 793 (holding that YWCA facility did not have a special relationship with at-risk resident that would create
Doe 169 v. Brandon 845 N.W.2d 174 Minn. 2014
Doe 169 v. Brandon 845 N.W.2d 174 Minn. 2014
Domagala v. Rolland 805 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 2011
Domagala v. Rolland 805 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 2011
an exception to this rule exists when the parties are in a special relationship and the harm to the plaintiff is foreseeable.
State v. Back 775 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 2009
State v. Back 775 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 2009
-10 (Minn.1996) (holding that a special relationship did not exist between the manager of a mobile home park and the resident children and that therefore the manager did not have a duty to take action to protect the children after they reported being sexually abused by another resident); Pietila v. Congdon, 362 N.
Bjerke v. Johnson 742 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 2007
Bjerke v. Johnson 742 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 2007
Becker v. Mayo Foundation 737 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 2007
Becker v. Mayo Foundation 737 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 2007
(citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 314A cmt.
Bjerke v. Johnson 727 N.W.2d 183 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Bjerke v. Johnson 727 N.W.2d 183 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Laska v. Anoka County 696 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Laska v. Anoka County 696 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Anderson v. State, Department of Natural Resources 693 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 2005
Anderson v. State, Department of Natural Resources 693 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 2005
Kuhl v. Heinen 672 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Kuhl v. Heinen 672 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Bundy v. Holmquist 669 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Bundy v. Holmquist 669 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Louis v. Louis 636 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 2001
Louis v. Louis 636 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 2001
-08 (Minn.1996); -75 (Minn.1993); (ah holding no duty because there was no special relationship between the parties).
Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp. 632 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 2001
Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp. 632 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 2001
D.M.S. v. Barber 627 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
D.M.S. v. Barber 627 N.W.2d 369 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp. 615 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Bigos v. Kluender 611 N.W.2d 816 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Bigos v. Kluender 611 N.W.2d 816 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Gilbertson v. Leininger 599 N.W.2d 127 Minn. 1999
Gilbertson v. Leininger 599 N.W.2d 127 Minn. 1999
-09 (Minn.1996) (concluding that manager of trailer park did not have a special relationship with children who were abused by another resident of the trailer park because the manager did not accept the children’s entrustment); Harper, d at 474 (finding no special relationship when plaintiff did “not estab
Canada by and Through Landy v. McCarthy 567 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1997
Canada by and Through Landy v. McCarthy 567 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1997
Fjerstad v. Heartland Racing Ass'n 563 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Fjerstad v. Heartland Racing Ass'n 563 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 1997