Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Homart Development Co. v. County of Hennepin, 538 N.W.2d 907.

48 citing documents.

Barry McReynolds, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Co. v. County of Hennepin
Glacial Plains Cooperative v. Hughes 705 N.W.2d 195 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Glacial Plains Cooperative v. Hughes 705 N.W.2d 195 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(stating that if a statute is free from ambiguity, court looks only at a statute’s plain meaning).
ILHC OF EAGAN, LLC v. County of Dakota 693 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 2005
ILHC OF EAGAN, LLC v. County of Dakota 693 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 2005
State v. Strandness 684 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Strandness 684 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Metro Milwaukee Auto Auction v. Coulson 604 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Metro Milwaukee Auto Auction v. Coulson 604 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(stating that if a statute is free from ambiguity, courts look only to the statute’s plain meaning).
Erickson v. State 599 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Erickson v. State 599 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(stating that if a statute is free from ambiguity, courts look only at a statute’s *591 plain meaning); Turna v. Commissioner of Econ.
Amaral v. Saint Cloud Hospital 598 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 1999
Amaral v. Saint Cloud Hospital 598 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 1999
State v. Edwards 589 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Edwards 589 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
:- The fundamental rule is to “look first to the specific statutory language and be guided by its natural and most obvious meaning.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
State v. Lopez-Solis 589 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1999
State v. Lopez-Solis 589 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1999
Amaral v. Saint Cloud Hospital 586 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Amaral v. Saint Cloud Hospital 586 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(citing Minn. Stat. § 645.08 (1994)).
State v. Hanson 583 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Hanson 583 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(where statute unambiguous, court has “no right to construe or interpret statute’s language”); Tuma v. Commissioner of Econ.
In Re the Welfare of A.A.E. 579 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In Re the Welfare of A.A.E. 579 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
U.S. Sprint Communications Co. v. Commissioner 578 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 1998
US SPRINT COMM. v. Commissioner of Rev. 578 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 1998
US SPRINT COMM. v. Commissioner of Rev. 578 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 1998
U.S. Sprint Communications Co. v. Commissioner 578 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 1998
Ruberto v. County of Washington 572 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1997
Ruberto v. County of Washington 572 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1997
Art Goebel, Inc. v. North Suburban Agencies, Inc. 567 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 1997
Art Goebel, Inc. v. North Suburban Agencies, Inc. 567 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 1997
(citing Morton Bldgs., ).
BFW CO. v. County of Ramsey 566 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 1997
BFW CO. v. County of Ramsey 566 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 1997
Medica, Inc. v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co. 566 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 1997
Medica, Inc. v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co. 566 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 1997
State Ex Rel. Schaller v. County of Blue Earth 563 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1997
Edina Education Ass'n v. Board of Education 562 N.W.2d 306 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Edina Education Ass'n v. Board of Education 562 N.W.2d 306 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(interpretation of statute is question of law subject to de novo review).
World Plan Executive Council-United States v. County of Ramsey 560 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1997
World Plan Executive Council-United States v. County of Ramsey 560 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1997
Questar Data Systems, Inc. v. Commissioner 549 N.W.2d 925 Minn. 1996
Questar Data Systems, Inc. v. Commissioner 549 N.W.2d 925 Minn. 1996
Smigla v. Schnell 547 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Smigla v. Schnell 547 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Dahlberg Hearing Systems, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 546 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1996
Dahlberg Hearing Systems, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 546 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1996
Bublitz v. Commissioner of Revenue 545 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1996
Bublitz v. Commissioner of Revenue 545 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1996

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by