Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co., 563 N.W.2d 724.
- Jostens, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. 612 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 2000
- Jostens, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. 612 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 2000
- Russell v. Johnson 608 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
Russell v. Johnson
608 N.W.2d 895
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Co., (citation omitted).
- Kellar v. Von Holtum 605 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 2000
- Kellar v. Von Holtum 605 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 2000
- Gopher Oil Co. v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co. 588 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
Gopher Oil Co. v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.
588 N.W.2d 756
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
The court instructed the jury on “expected or intended” property damage with language taken from Domtar
- Westling Manufacturing Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 581 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- Westling Manufacturing Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 581 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- Redeemer Covenant Church of Brooklyn Park v. Church Mutual Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-
Redeemer Covenant Church of Brooklyn Park v. Church Mutual Insurance Co.
567 N.W.2d 71
Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Co., (distinguishing a case where exclusions of coverage for property damage "arising out of” an owned premises were held applicable and holding that an exclusion of “damage to or destruction of property owned by the insured” did not apply).