Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Zip Sort, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue, 567 N.W.2d 34.

27 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. K. and A. S., Parents 9 N.W.3d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. K. and A. S., Parents 9 N.W.3d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Co., Zip Sort, n.9 (Minn. 1997).
Judith Rygwall, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Amy Rygwall, deceased, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Zip Sort, Inc. v. Comm’r of Revenue
Heilman v. Courtney 926 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 2019
Heilman v. Courtney 926 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 2019
Zip Sort, Inc. v. Comm'r of Revenue , , 39 n.9 (Minn. 1997).
Doe 175 ex rel. Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School District, ISD No. 13 842 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Doe 175 ex rel. Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School District, ISD No. 13 842 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
ule 103.04 in conjunction with an exception that applies if “ ‘the question raised for the first time on appeal is plainly decisive of the entire controversy on its merits’ ” and “ ‘there is no possible advantage or disadvantage to either party in not *46 having had a prior ruling on the question by the trial court.’ ” Schober, d at 294 (quoting Zip Sort, , 89 n. 9 (Minn.1997)).
LaMont v. Independent School District 728 814 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 2012
LaMont v. Independent School District 728 814 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 2012
Zip Sort, Inc. v. Comm’r of Revenue
Dickhoff ex rel. Dickhoff v. Green 811 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Dickhoff ex rel. Dickhoff v. Green 811 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Zip Sort, Inc. v. Comm’r of Rev.
Day Masonry v. Independent School District 347 781 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 2010
Day Masonry v. Independent School District 347 781 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 2010
Zip Sort, Inc. v. Comm’r of Revenue
Schober v. Commissioner of Revenue 778 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 2010
Schober v. Commissioner of Revenue 778 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 2010
Zip Sort, Inc. v. Comm’r of Revenue, , 39 n. 9 (Minn.1997).
Kratzer v. Welsh Companies, LLC 771 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 2009
Kratzer v. Welsh Companies, LLC 771 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 2009
Zip Sort, Inc. v. Comm’r of Revenue
Glacial Plains Cooperative v. Lindgren 759 N.W.2d 661 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Glacial Plains Cooperative v. Lindgren 759 N.W.2d 661 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
*664 Zip Sort, Inc. v. Comm’r of Revenue
Sprint Spectrum LP v. Commissioner of Revenue 676 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 2004
Sprint Spectrum LP v. Commissioner of Revenue 676 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 2004
In Zip Sort, Inc. v. Comm’r of Rev., we considered whether bar codes on envelopes could be classified as tangible personal property.
Reiling v. City of Eagan 664 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Reiling v. City of Eagan 664 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Zip Sort, Inc. v. Comm’r of Revenue
Skyline Preservation Foundation v. County of Polk 621 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 2001
Skyline Preservation Foundation v. County of Polk 621 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 2001
Zip Sort, Inc. v. Comm’r of Revenue
Herrmann v. McMenomy & Severson 583 N.W.2d 283 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Herrmann v. McMenomy & Severson 583 N.W.2d 283 Minn. Ct. App. 1998