Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Gisege, 561 N.W.2d 152.

70 citing documents.

State v. Goodloe 718 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 2006
State v. Goodloe 718 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 2006
State v. Carr 692 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Carr 692 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Noble 669 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Noble 669 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
See, (holding that attempted second-degree murder does not require proof of bodily harm).
State v. Davis 656 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Davis 656 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Robledo-Kinney 615 N.W.2d 25 Minn. 2000
State v. Robledo-Kinney 615 N.W.2d 25 Minn. 2000
In State v. Gisege, we held that “the trial court had no discretion to grant the defendant’s request for a jury instruction regarding a lesser but nonincluded offense * *
State v. Bashire 606 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Bashire 606 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
the supreme court discussed the fundamental rule that a defendant cannot be held to answer for a crime not charged.
Davis v. State 595 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 1999
Davis v. State 595 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 1999
In Re the Welfare of D.W.O. 594 N.W.2d 207 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In Re the Welfare of D.W.O. 594 N.W.2d 207 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(conviction for charge that was at variance with indictment would be reversed only if defendant was deprived of opportunity to prepare defense).
State v. DeVerney 592 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 1999
State v. DeVerney 592 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 1999
(conducting a 17.05 analysis when a conviction is at variance with the indictment).
State v. Gisege 582 N.W.2d 229 Minn. 1998
State v. Gisege 582 N.W.2d 229 Minn. 1998