Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Wiernasz, 584 N.W.2d 1.

69 citing documents.

Chafoulias v. Peterson 668 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 2003
1657 ; ); see also Horner, d at 795 (“While we give ‘due weight to inferences drawn from those facts by resident judges,’ we review de novo the legal conclusion of whether probable cause existed.”).
In Re the Welfare of M.A.K. 667 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Welfare of M.A.K. 667 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Jones v. Commissioner of Public Safety 660 N.W.2d 472 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Jones v. Commissioner of Public Safety 660 N.W.2d 472 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Staats 658 N.W.2d 207 Minn. 2003
State v. Staats 658 N.W.2d 207 Minn. 2003
Hartung v. Commissioner of Public Safety 634 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Hartung v. Commissioner of Public Safety 634 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
The determination of whether an officer vindicates a driver’s right to counsel is a mixed question of law and fact, “requiring the appellate court to apply the controlling legal standard to historical facts as determined by the trial court.” (footnote omitted) (citation omitted).
In Re the Welfare of R.J.E. 630 N.W.2d 457 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re the Welfare of R.J.E. 630 N.W.2d 457 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-3 (Minn.1998) (citation omitted); (citation omitted); (“The test is not whether a reasonable person under the circumstances would believe they were not free to leave, but whether a reasonable person und
In Re the Welfare of G.S.P. 610 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re the Welfare of G.S.P. 610 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-5 (Minn.1998); -71 (Minn.1998).
State v. Edwards 589 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Edwards 589 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Lee 585 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1998
State v. Lee 585 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1998
Sullivan v. State 585 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1998
Sullivan v. State 585 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1998